CNN Caper: Izzy Santa email to Project Veritas, Subject: "I believe my employment with Project Veritas has been terminated."

NJO: Source: CNN's Right on the Edge documentary. The details of the email's date and who it's from and who it's to are illegible, but it's obviously from Izzy Santa by context, and "To: Maureen Wagner" seems like a good fit for the blurry words above the following text.

I believe my employment with Project Veritas has been terminated. The scant information I have my for my hypothesis came to me by way of a telephone call from XXX who informed me by simply stating "...we couldn't save your job..."

If this is indeed the case, there was no mention of why my employment was terminated. Of course, I am confused, perplexed and hurt by the way this situation is being handled as every course of action I have taken during my employment with Project Veritas always has been in the best interest of the organization. In fact, when first hired, I was told that my job was to "...take care of James," a responsibility I took seriously and tried my best to uphold.

Other than this vague directive, I was given neither a position description, nor a clear directive on what my job entailed. Therefore, I was forced to proceed as I deemed necessary to benefit both James and Project Veritas.

If my employment with Project Veritas is indeed terminated I will require the following:

1. A letter signed by James and the Board of Project Veritas officially terminating my employment.
2. A description of how I failed (illegible) requirements of my (illegible)
3: (illegible)

CNN Caper: Izzy Santa email to unknown party, Subject: "Fwd: doc - CNN caper"

Source: CNN's Right on the Edge documentary.

From: Izzy Santa

Date: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: doc - CNN caper
To: XXXX

I have a problem on my hands that I think has potential for unnecessary backlash.

Today, James is meeting with a CNN correspondent today on his boat. She is doing a piece on the movement of conservative filmmakers.

She doesn't know she is getting on a boat but rather James' office. James has staged the boat to be a palace of pleasure with all sorts of props, wants to have a bizarre sexual conversation with her.
He wants to gag CNN. The document attached has all details.

The idea is incredibly bad and second CNN could go after James, the reporter is flying in and renting a car to have a talk with James.

What do you think? This is happening at 12:30 EST.

I am driving up to help James but the more I think about it we should not be doing this.

Cheers,
Izzy

CNN Caper: James O'Keefe email to Izzy Santa, Subject: CNN operation

NJO: Source: CNN's Right on the Edge documentary.

On Aug 14, 2010, at 8:05 PM,
James E. O'Keefe III wrote:

> Could you come down Tuesday for the CNN operation - I'll need another person around.

> She arrives at 12:30

> Afterward, I need to be brought back to DC to catch a bus back to NJ.

CNN Caper: James O'Keefe email to Izzy Santa, Subject: "Fwd: pleasure palace graphic"

NJO: Source for email and screenshot: CNN's Right on the Edge documentary.

From: "James E. O'Keefe III"

Date: August 13, 2010 1:35:14 PM EDT

To: Izzy Santa

Subject: Fwd: pleasure palace graphics


Please go to fedex and print out pleasure palace graphic on large banner - needs to be ready by late tonight - if possible...

James O'Keefe on G.K. Chesterton and "The Free Press"

NJO: Title, video and caption from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Uploaded on Aug 12, 2010

"Video courtesy of American Chesterton Society and Doug Jackson." http://chesterton.org/

Blurb from theprojectveritas.com:

Speech at 29th Annual G.K. Chesterton Conference

Aug 13 2010

On August 6th, I was privileged to give a talk on the importance of undercover journalism vs. stenography – what the mainstream media usually does.

Transcript from freerepublic.com but originally from projectveritas.com:
Transcript of James O'Keefe speech to the G.K. Chesterton society at Mount St. Mary's in Maryland

Project Veritas ^ | Aug. 13 2010 | James O'Keefe

Karl Marx said that philosophers have explained the world; it is our job to change it. I say Chesterton has explained what's wrong with the wrong; it is our job to restore it.

A specter is haunting the powerful and the corrupt, and that is the specter of the independent, free, renegade video journalist. That journalist seeks to correct the wrongs of the society we live in. There is a lot wrong with the society we live in. Chesterton says, [paraphrasing] "The position we now have reached is this. Starting from the state, we try to remedy the failures of all the families, all the nurseries, all the workshops, all the secondary institutions that once had some authority of their own. Everything is ultimately brought into the courts." It seems like the world has become one giant divorce court.

Ken Larrey email to Nadia Naffe, Subject: "Re: Proposal"

From:     "Ken Larrey"
Subject:  RE: Proposal
Date:      August 12, 2010 10:04:18 PM EDT
To:         

Hannah could probably tell you a bit about it.  She's been in on some/most of the emails.  Our plan involves Trinity United (Obama's church) and Jeremiah Wright or Otis Moss.  If you live in Tampa, then you must have travelled considerably for the Maxine Waters thing, so perhaps you'd be up for Chicago after all.

Based on your work with Hannah and James, I imagine I can put trust in you.   We've tried to keep the plans for this fairly close to the vest, so please don't forward this email and keep all of this to yourself.  Basically, we'll be exploring the Marxist teachings of Liberation theology and the aforementioned pastors.  Liberation Theology was effectively devised as a way to work Marxism into Christianity as a vessel for Marxist revolution/transformation.

There are also some quasi-shady dealings that go on with the church, which we may be looking at as well.

What is your situation/hours and availability for travel?

Best,
Ken


NJO: Accompanying planning document here.
 

Culture warriors involved:

Ken Larrey
Hannah Giles
Nadia Naffe

NJO: Source: Occupy For Accountabiliity and www.velvetrevolution.us.

Preview: Maxine Waters, OneUnited Bank Hidden Camera Investigation

Uploaded on Aug 12, 2010

Hidden Camera Investigation of Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) and the conduct of the employees at OneUnited Bank. The relationship between Waters and OneUnited is currently being investigated by the House Ethics Committee.

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Nadia Naffe 

CNN Caper: James O'Keefe email to Ben Wetmore, Jonathon Burns and Izzy Santa, Subject: "CNN phone call attached"

NJO: Source: CNN's Right on the Edge documentary.

From: James E. O'Keefe III
Date: Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:36 PM
Subject: CNN phone call attached
To: Ben Wetmore, Jonathon Burns, Izzy Santa


Getting Closer. Audio attached of conversation with Abbie.

What do you think of her reaction guys.

She said she could do it Monday, Tuesday.

- Ben, you think I could get her on the boat?

Landrieu Dance

Uploaded on Apr 18, 2011

Get Landrieu Dance on iTunes: http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/land...

Check out VICTICRAT featuring James O'keefe :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhPqmJ...

Directed by Christian Hartsock. Produced by Eric Elder. Performed by James O'Keefe and Anthony Dini. Starring: Dori Russell, Amy Bissonnette, Stacy Fratelli, Jacqueline Gage, Renee Reres, Vanessa Ross, Jessica Lynne Smith, Nick Gust, Shaughn Adeleye, Brian Lloyd, Eric Johnson, Ethan Czahor, Tara Ketterer, Ryan Sorba. Associate Producer: Alvaro Day. First Assistant Director: Adam Weinberg. Director of Photography: Andrew Hrera. Lightly Edited by: Victor Shklyar. Production Designer: Rae Deslich. Costume Designer: Jacquelynn Nicolle Remery. Set Photographers: Andrew Kim, Brandon Williams. EPK/DIT: Robert Deltour. Steadicam Operator: Aaron Smith. First Assistant Camera: Casey Todd. Sound Mixer: Phillip Bladh. Gaffer: Brody Culbertson. Best Boy: Ronnie Gotch. Set Dressers: Vinny Chance, Caroline Louis. Caterer: Chris Holm. Production Assistants: Alexander Haberbush, Gabriella Hoffman, Kelly Steele. Special Thanks: Daniel Smith, The City of Pasadena. POV PICTURES. DIONYSUS PRODUCTIONS. THE PROJECT VERITAS.

Contact:
EricElder@povpictures.net Christian@DionysusProductions.net.

NJO: Video and blurb from Christian Hartsock's YouTube channel. The song is a reworked version of an earlier O'Keefe and Dini jobby called "Hot Action" which was used in James' "UCLA Condoms" video. Here's my transcription of the lyrics:

Take, take, take your time

Hope that you can find
A way to make it right

To get your sleep at night

Listen to my basics
Open your mouth and taste it
Don't be afraid to face it
Give up your comfortable
Hundred K solution
Kickback contribution
For the truer use than

What you come to know

We need a bit of action
That will give this the traction
That's a matter of faction
Why don't you bring, we kick the door (?)
To give some satisfaction
When you take civil action
We'll go out and attack them
Investigate and hit the ground

Corruption all around

Hard to pin it down

Blinded by your lie

Truth is my disguise

Try to call us racists

Makin' up stupid space lists
All them haters faceless
Well they ain't in the know
Gonna interrupt 'em
Fraud and waste and corruption
Find you, make you famous
So let's start the show

(Chorus x2)


Familiar minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Christian Hartsock
Eric Kaiser Johnson
Shaughn Adeleye
Ryan Jeffrey Sorba
Lila Rose

The CNN Caper document, Part II: Abbie Boudreau

NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, the second part of the CNN Caper planning document, which deals specifically with Abbie Boudreau, i.e. how to go about damaging her credibility and by extension CNN's.

Content of document sourced from Breitbart Unmasked.

CNN Caper part two: Abbie Boudreau

1. Activists needed

a. James
b. possibly one other person

2. Support needed

a. None really, could be done with just James
b. Ideally one other person to be in the parking lot or woods to get reaction as they leave, and b-roll footage.

3. Equipment needed

a. Video

1. hidden cams on the boat
2. tripod and overt recorder near the end, an obvious sex tape machine

b. Props

1. condom jar
2. dildos
3. Music
a. Alicia keys
b. 80s romance songs, things that are typically James
c. avoid Marvin Gaye as too cliche
4. lube
5. ceiling mirror
6. posters and paintings of naked women
7. playboys and pornographic magazines
8. candles
9. Viagra and stamina pills
10. fuzzy handcuffs
11. blindfold

4. Concerns and potential problems

a. bad reaction
Bad reactions need to be met with adaptation and adjustment to either ease off or apply more social pressure to the situation in order to keep her in the skit.

b. Christian Hartsock
Considering the complex dynamic with Hartsock, that he will see this CNN connection as his 'big break' and that he's notorious for having loose lips, he certainly can't be trusted to keep this in confidence, and will speak to either people his age or perhaps even to CNN directly to curry favor.  He should be given the vaguest details, and if he's upset about the potential complication to his future, reminded that future operations will be newsworthy as well.

c. if CNN gets advance warning
If CNN gets advance warning and finds this out, you should simply cancel the operation, period.  Their forewarning can be

d. if she refuses to get on the boat
Just leave.  You're in a position of strength.  Make her come to you.  To leave the boat kills the operation.

e. if they refuse the interview
You're negotiating from a position of strength, so simply refuse to do the interview until they agree to your terms: Boudreau and during a time when you're out on the boat and relaxed.

f. Running the operation without props and with a dirty boat
In the rush to get this done, the temptation will be to skimp on the details, and that just puts two things at risk: 1) Boudreau's confusion as to whether this is legitimate, ruining her reaction which is key to the operation, and 2) making the video that much less interesting lacking props and proper ambiance.

g. too many chefs in the kitchen
I already spent 30 minutes defending the idea and trying to battle crazy permutations from Burns.  The more people you tell about an operation, the more it 1) opens it up to unknown future problems, 2) good ideas have to defend against bad ones, 3) people running their mouths to Hartsock, CNN and other people will cause additional unknown complications.

h. After the fact with CNNCNN could issue a statement, the Anderson Cooper show could make some comment about what a lech you are, or could do something either on the presumption that you 1) actually are a creep or 2) they realize it was a gag afterwards  or 3) they admit it was a gag, but say you're a creep and an anti-feminist for doing it regardless.  It's probably most likely they'll ignore the story and hope it goes away, but if it does get covered, there are likely three main scenarios, advice pending each main eventuality:

1) if they pursue this as you are a creep, you should play it up with them initially only to reveal that the tape was made beforehand confirming this was a gag.  Focus on the fact that this was a gag the entire time and they aren't 'in' on the joke.

30% chance

2) if they admit it was a gag, you should release the footage and focus on the fact they got punked, and make sure to emphasize Abbie's name and overall status to help burden her career with this video, incident and her bad judgment in pursuing you so aggressively.  Keep the focus on Abbie if they try to make this just a stunt and move on.

3) if they go on the attack, you should point out the the hypocrisy in CNN using the inherent sexuality of these women to sell viewers and for ratings, passing up more esteemed and respectable journalists who aren't "bubble-headed bleach blondes" and keep the focus on CNN.  If they attack, keep the focus on CNN and the higher-ups at CNN, such as Jonathan Klein, who has changed the channel from serious news to unserious news by pretty-blonde anchors in lieu of real journalists.  If they attack, fight back even harder.

60% chance

i. Burns: IIED concerns

IIED has a high threshold, and courts typically don't like it anyway.  The elements are:

1. Defendant acted intentionally or recklessly; and
2. Defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous; and
3. Defendant's act is the cause of the distress; and
4. Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.

I think this is not 2) extreme and outrageous and 3) she would have a hard time proving "distress" and 4) would also be tough, given her experience as a hardened reporter.

j. Sexual harrassment concerns

Sexual harrassment is primarily a workplace concern and not out of the workplace.  Though we're perhaps not 100% in the clear on this, the risk of this is very low.

5. Dialogue

a. Pre-operation video

(Dialogue below under number 10)

b. Initial smalltalk and conversation, coming onto the boat

c. build-up to the catalytic moment

AB: Are you recording this?
JO: If you want, I can record it, I usually don't record it unless I'm trying out a new position or something really kinky though.  I have the camera set up though, so we can do whatever you want, whatever you feel comfortable with.

AB: Is this a gag?
JO: Abbie, I'm not really into S&M, so I don't have any toys like that...
AB: No, is this a joke, are you kidding?
JO: Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were talking about S&M, what do you mean is this a gag?
AB: You can't be serious, I'm married.
JO: Abbie, there's never going to be a right time for you and I.  There's only right now.  We have to make the most of the time we're given, and we're being given right now.

AB: Are you serious?
JO: I've never met a woman like you, one who had the drive, the ambition, and the same creative power, the same creative juice. We're the same person Abbie, we're meant to be together.  I'm serious because my heart is serious.

AB: James, this is not professional.
JO: Abbie, this is our time together.  This isn't work-time, and it's not CNN-time or Breitbart-time, it's you and me time. This is what we get to spend together, and let's not ruin it with worky talk.  Let's spend it with us-time, and let's talk with our bodies.

AB: I realize what you're doing.
JO: What I'm doing is putting my heart on the line here.  I don't do this with other people, I've been hurt in the past, I'm trying to make something special here, Abbie, so let's talk about this.

AB: (crying)
JO: Baby don't cry, tears are for yesterday, pleasure is for today.

AB: James, I spent a lot of money to be here today...
JO: (interrupting) Abbie, I spent a lot of money as well, but I'm spending a lot of emotional capital in order to put my heart on the line for you.  I don't share myself this much with people, this is hard for me.

AB: James, if you didn't want to be serious in this interview, you should have told me, this is unprofessional
JO: Abbie, I came here to talk and be together, is it unprofessional to have feelings?  Is it wrong for me to want to get to know you better?

d. the reveal

AB: I don't know, I don't know what's going on... I just don't know...
JO: Abbie, I have something to tell you.  I brought you here not just to talk, or to do the interview, but that we could enjoy one another.  Abbie, I want to be your greatest story, I'll let you inside if you'll let me be inside of you.

e. after the joke

AB: I just need to go, get me back to the dock.
JO: Hey, I can take no for an answer.  I just want you to know that there are a lot of girls I passed up in order to be with you today. MSNBC was ready to go all the way and I had to turn them down.

AB: I want to go back.
JO: And I want a hand job, but we don't always get what we want.  I'll take you back if you insist though.

f. Woliner jokes are under number 11

6. Persona

James should have a more sleazy persona than normal, with slicked back hair and exposing his chest.  It should be entirely over the top.  The persona should be very touchy-feely,ideally wearing gold chainds and wih cigarettes.

7. Timeline

a. Filming and time-stamping the original 2 minute speech explaining the future punk
b. lining things up with CNN
c. sailing - Tuesday August 17, 2010
d. aftermath

8. Additional informations and research needed

a. Boudreau's biography and background, for discussion during the operation.

9. Jokes and one-liners

Abby, this is the pleasure palace, and I want you to show you the inner sanctum.

I want to take you to a higher place, CNN must be a tough place to work, let's make some headline love.

It's not news, it's CNN.

10. Video that must be time-stamped and released prior to Tuesday:

My name is James, I work in video activism and journalism.  I've been approached by CNN for an interview where I know what their angle is: they want to portray me and my friends as crazies, as non-journalists, as unprofessional and likely as homophobes, racists or bigots of some sort. Abby, who works for Anderson Cooper at CNN, a network notorious for journalistic malpractice, wants to lull me into thinking she's my friends so she can use me and hurt my career.

Instead, I've decided to have a little fun.  Instead of giving her a serious interview, I'm going to punk CNN.  Abbie has been trying to seduce me to use me, in order to spin a lie about me.  So, I'm going to seduce her, on camera, to use her for a video.  This bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who comes on at five will get a taste of her own medicine, she'll get seduced on camera and you'll get to see the awkwardness and the aftermath.

Please sit back and enjoy the show.

11. Woliner one-liners and jokes

a. In general, about her

"She said what?? This woman's facts are more flimsy than her reputation at the sorority house."

"I saw her and her friends gather outside the studio after the show....I thought I was walking into an audition of 'The Contender' "

"She has a winning, gold-medal personality. Too bad the special olympics don't feature that event."

"After her last poltical rant, NOW organized a campaign to repeal the 19th amendment."

"She really is two-faced. And they're both hideous."

"After all these years, she's got former schoolmates going public to speak out against her. I never thought one could make so many enemies in the second grade."

"It's no surprise she advocates wealth redistribution, as her next three ex-husbands will one day attest"

"Some question her intelligence, but I think it takes a strong mind to regurgitate the talking points of a 60's burnout who lived in a van for three years."

b. In person, to her

"We should meet up after this for a cup of coffee. If I'm paying though, I expect at least a hand job afterwards."

"I see some sharks in some distance...but I promise to protect you, for a small price (looks her up and down and smiles)."

"I always knew you wanted to get me alone, I just figured it'd be at a cheap motel involving handcuffs."

"I love it when you look at me like that. Makes me want to ravage you Ghengis Khan-style."

"Your breasts are incredibly perky. What did that run you...seven, eight grand?"

"You've got amazing lips. I'll bet you've made many football teams happy."

"We should come back to my place after this. I've got a brand new Sony with 3 hours of memory."

"Don't listen to people who say you wear too makeup. I like it. It says to the world, 'I'm worth at least $300 an hour'."

"I can tell you work out and eat right. Just so you know, semen is a great source of protein."

"Since we're at sea, do you want to role play? I'll be the captain and you can be my gallows wench."

12. The overall narrative

a. The theatrical narrative - "on stage"

On stage you are portraying yourself as a tortured artist who is having difficulty finding female companionship due to your art. You are doing this interview because you have to, but you want to creatively and physically connect with this woman in order to fulfill your male desires.

b. The video narrative - "off stage" - the final video product

Off stage the narrative is that you don't take CNN seriously and consider their reporting to be a joke.  You can use a hardline feminist critique against women like Boudreau in order to blunt charges of sexism and also to confuse liberals who will, no doubt, try to use this and any action you take against you.  By pointing out the good journalists who aren't photogenic, you play into their higher beliefs against objective beauty in order to cut Boudreau down to size.  Fundamentally this is all just a way to hurt CNN, but the final product should emphasize how unserious Anderson Cooper and CNN's "journalism" is, and how, noting that ridiculousness and the ridiculousness of their anchors, you decided to play a joke on them instead of giving them a legitimate interview.

As they seduce subjects, so shall they be seduced.  As they tell packaged stories ridiculing their subjects, so shall they be ridiculed.

13. The "joke"

The joke is that the tables have turned on CNN.  Using hot blondes to seduce interviewees to get screwed on television, you are faux seducing her in order to screw her on television.

14. Acting and adaptation

 As the operation is going on, James will have to adapt and adjust to her mood and her reaction.  If she is pulling away, withdraw and pull her back in.  If she's unsure, comfort her and reassure her.  Vacillate between somewhat serious interview and the come-hither persona as needed in order to confuse her judgment and also keep her on the boat.

She wants to do the interview, she spent thousands of dollars to do this interview, she is invested.  Our job is to make sure she doesn't run away or break too soon.  You want to make sure you have plenty of video and pre-reveal moments before the reveal, and not to proverbially "shoot your load" before the catalytic moment, the big reveal for her.  So keep her hooked and use hot-cold and push-pull kind of psychological tactics in order to keep her in the skit.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Ben R. Wetmore (who wrote the document)
Geoff Woliner (who wrote the "one-liners and jokes" under point 11, I'm 99 per cent sure)
Jonathon C. "Jon / John" Burns (He of the "crazy permutations" and the "Intentional Inflictment of Emotional Distress [lawsuit] concerns", a founding member of St. Louis Tea Party)

James O'Keefe, Jon Burns and Ben Wetmore
(Photo taken in 2011,
i.e. some months after their
failed CNN-shaming plot.)

Geoff Woliner

The CNN Caper document, Part I: Getting CNN to report on a fake story and then spoof them the same day

NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, the first part of the CNN Caper planning document, Project "Getting CNN to report on a fake story and then spoof them the same day".

Source: Breitbart Unmasked.

CNN Caper

Overview:
Getting CNN to report on a fake story and then spoof them the same day
Target:
CNN
Activists: James
Technical people needed:
Video and sound engineer types
Written by:
Ben
Priority/Idea value ranking by James (1-10):
?

Discussion:

Specifically, as it regards Christian Hartsock and the video shoot, after our discussion together, I think it would involve too much risk and yield too few rewards to engage CNN while doing a video shoot. The danger to say something out of context, off the cuff, or potentially politically incorrect is too large. The mistake that Sorba is making by having CNN closeby for so long is the same logic here: this is a known unfriendly media organization whose primary story will be negative. Their best story would be one that ruined a center-right career.

The challenge is to create an operation that could spoof CNN, hurt their credibility and show the 'big lie' that they operate under, showing the truth that is unknown to the general public.

Potential 'big lies' as it regards CNN:
1. Their general bias against conservatives
2. Their own internal racism against whites
3. Their potential internal racism against minorities
4. Shoddy journalism, and low journalistic standards

Perhaps the greatest combination of these potential big lies would be to spoof CNN and get them to report on a topic that is entirely false. Fake journalism scandals are often news, with Jayson Blair and Stephen Glass being the most prominent examples.

Spoofing CNN

We should entice them with some video that they want to believe. The media has been in a frenzy for the past few years on a relatively small number of topics and subjects.

1. Tea party racism
2. Arizona racism
3. Sarah Palin
4. GOP leadership scandals

Certain past topics, such as the war or terrorism, seem to be relatively off the radar as it regards to the news interest of the mainstream media. Things that are on politics, the GOP, scandal, race issues, are all pertinent and relevant.

The general political issues of relevance:

1. Race
2. Immigration
3. Budgets

If we were to offer CNN evidence of racism, playing on these currently relevant issues, and produced enough supporting evidence to prove the claim we make, have them write a story and then prepare our allies to pounce, it could be a good way to undercut their credibility.

Things we could use to entice them:

1. False video evidence
2. False textual evidence and documents
3. False interviews

The false video evidence, for one, could be focused on the incident with Congressman John Lewis where he said he was called a "nigger" by tea party protesters, even though the video evidence disproved his claim.

Spoofing video evidence proving Lewis' claim, along with a good story that the tea party had suppressed such evidence, might be enough for CNN to report on the story.

The video evidence just needs to be simple, just Lewis walking by with a faint "nigger" said in the background, yelled by someone there.  The video evidence would need to be sufficient to get by potential fact-checkers at CNN who might analyze the video and audio.

Potential video:
1. Lewis walking by and someone saying "nigger"
2. Proof that the tea party had edited out the word 'nigger' from released video
3. Video footage of the tea party taking the video evidence from other people the day of the event.

Potential documents:
1. Frantic emails from within the tea party that shows the word was said, and how to cover up the video evidence.
2. Voicemails from tea party leaders couching people to say scripted lines and avoid admitting that there was racism at the event.

The danger is, of course, that the lie becomes the official truth, and so it would be necessary to immediately deconstruct this story on friendly networks and media outlets.  The goal isn't to draw out the scandal after all, rather just to embarrass CNN by having them report a false story.  So immediately reporting on the falseness of the story would be key.

Precautions against the story becoming false truth:
1. Releasing proof of its fraud the same day
2. The fact no one watches CNN
3. The impact of one day of news versus the collective effort of those battling the media establishment
4. The competition between liberal networks to show and report on CNN's failures
5. The extensiveness of our evidence showing that it was wholesale fraud
6. Exclusive reporting and interviewing with the tea party to explain why you did this, that you support the tea party types, and that you wanted to show what CNN 'had in their heart: hatred for normal Americans.'
7. The waning influence of the 'racist' label and charge.
8. Journalism outlets that will investigate and report on CNN's fraud.

I don't know the relevant and friendly media outlets, so that part of the discussion is not included here.  My guess would be that it includes Fox and the bloggers.

In order to spoof the CNN reporters, it would have to be careful and coy to mention the evidence or proof in question.

Discussion with the CNN reporter

James: "it's frustrating to keep having these racism stories come out about me, I'm just trying to report on issues, I feel like ACORN for example was helping more African-Americans than it was helping but no one seems to notice that."

CNN: "well, many of the people on your videos were black after all."

James: "but they were doing an overall disservice to the African-American community, they weren't helping with jobs, resources, access, and combating real racism.  It just seems like the 'racist' tag gets thrown on anything, even things that aren't racist, and doesn't get noticed on things that are really racist even on the right."

CNN: "what are you talking about"

James: "look, there is racism out there, in different organizations and movements, no one denies that, I'm just saying it's aggravating that I have to deal with it when I'm the one trying to get Breitbart and others to report on the real racism on the right, and the evidence that's out there."

CNN: "what evidence?"

James: "you know.  Look, I shouldn't even be talking be talking to you about this."

CNN: "well you are, what evidence?"

James: "well, like that John Lewis thing, the tea party was able to cover that up pretty fast and pretty effectively."

Timeline:

Stage 1 - plotting and planning
Stage 2 - research and gathering evidence, finding the right individuals
Stage 3 - producing the video
Stage 4 - audit, planning, gaming CNN
Stage 5 - alerting friendly outlets before the publication
Stage 6 - release of the video and the counterpunch from friendlys

To Do:

1. Assess whether this project has merit
2. Identify a reporter to use to float the story
3. Identify trustworthy talent that could handle the technical side of the production
4. Find tea party video from the Lewis event in particular, or other documents and evidence to use to buttress the story
5. Make a critical audit of the evidence and story, with an eye on what level of detail CNN is going to go through
6. Reassess the entire project and make sure there are no holes or problems before publication
7. Produce the video and evidence
8. Float it to the CNN reporter, find out when it will be released
9. Alert the friendly outlets, give them the evidence needed to show the story is a fraud

Permutations/Alternative versions:
a. Other angles:
1) fake story
2) fake journalist
3) fake source
4) fake advertiser
tape a call from a business CEO to the ad departemtn at CNN, have them call you back on theire personal cell number, goal is to get the ad dept. to agree to pressure the newsroom to adjust its coverage.
5) have a fake 'student newscrew' interview tope people at CNN

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Ben R. Wetmore (who wrote the document)

Ben Wetmore

Operation Maple Trinity planning document

Operation Maple Trinity

Abstract:
This is an operation intended to expose the Marxist, Anti-American nature of Trinity United in Chicago in a way that can ultimately capture it in a few short minutes of condensed video to leave no doubt.  It is equally intended to capture it in such an explosive way that the Lamestream Media is forced to cover it.

Main Targets:
Otis Moss
Jeremiah Wright (if accessible)
Other TUCC pastors

Main Characters:
Martin Smith (Ken Larrey) - A white, 27 year old graduate student set to enroll at UChicago Business School, grew up in Toronto, graduated from Duke, went to work for Morgan Stanley.  Father is a retired bank executive (Toronto-Dominion bank), who also managed hedge funds, now private investor.  Family was formerly tied with and still loosely tied with the Community Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist), though they exert influence in the Liberal Party, even some in the Conservative Party.

Elijah Bernard (Shaughn Adeleye) - A black 36 year old consultant working for Bain & Company in Chicago (recently transferred from Dallas), graduated LSU, law degree Duke.  Married with one daughter, but gay (irrelevant to operation Maple Trinity). Also grew up in a Marxist family.

(optional)
1 or 2 pastors (Doug Giles perhaps, other black guy) - struggling liberation theologians around Toronto partially financed by Martin Smith's father.

Costumes/Props:
Ken:
suit, nice shoes, etc.
Flashy gold watch
Gold magnetic earring (Bill Ayers style)
Hidden camera

Shaughn:
Suit, nice shoes, etc.
Flashy Gold Watch
Hidden Camera

Other Requirements:
Lodging, parking, internet, perhaps a week or more
Travel (probably by car)
Possibly Fake Id's, Business Cards
Possibly cell phones with Chicago and/or Toronto area codes

Plot Summary:
              Elijah Bernard sets up a meeting with Otis Moss to discuss joining the church.  The brings along his friend, Martin Smith, with whom he crossed paths at Duke.  Elijah explains that he and Martin, like Moss, are both fellow travelers.  He has been telling Martin about the church and liberation theology and Martin took an interest so Elijah brought him along.
              Martin further explains who he is, that his family and their associates are committed to a Marxist transformation of Canada, we have seen the evils and oppression of capitalism, we seek to end the evils of globalization, and we are committed to putting a stop to the evil foreign wars and invasions of the Canadian/American empires.  Martin explains that he is considering attending a few sermons and establishing a relationship with the Church, jokes about how odd it will be being white.  Martin hands Moss a copy of To Set the Captives Free: Liberation Theology in Canada as a gift and explains that though he grew up being taught that religion is wrong, that it was a tool to pacify the masses to accept their lot, his father and other Marxists in Canada had come to understand the value of liberation theology.  Although Martin is not as directly involved in the movement, he is there representing his father and his father's interests.  They are interested in sending some of their own pastors who have been trying to learn and advance liberation theology in Canada to learn at Trinity United.

[The conversation will likely evolve from there.  Moss is likely to inquire about this proposal and the whole situation.  We aim to lead Otis Moss into a discussion about Marxism, Liberation Theology, Liberation Theology in Canada, the subversion of the church for Marxist purposes, etc.  The point is to make our intentions clear and explain them as what would seem to most people as a nefarious/cynical plot.  Here are some talking points to throw in.}

            Martin explains that the state of Canada is such that the conservatives are in power and the socialization of Canada has been stalled and is even in decline.  We believe a big part of the reason Marxism is failing in Canada is because we have failed to control the churches.  Liberation Theology gives us a way to use the gospel and the church to advance Marxism and Marxist principles.
            Martin also explains that even though Trinity United teaches Black Liberation Theology, his family's interest is in liberation theology, as the black population of Canada is 2.5%.  However, the black church is also uniquely of interest because in addition to organization black churches, we have this (particularly bold, edgy, creative) idea of taking note of the energy, emotion, and soul that has always been a part of the black church, and which we believe is so important to bringing diverse groups together and lifting their spirits, and adapting it to other churches even for wishes.  We believe nobody does this better than Trinity United.  Most importantly, we want to study how Trinity United manages all the little things that go into managing a church and bringing people into the Marxist movement.  Community outreach, recruiting, establishing ties with local government, etc.  It's one thing to read about using liberation theology to foment Marxist revolutionary spirits, it's another to do it in real life.
             Discuss other various Alinksy principles.  Discuss the Clarence-Piven strategy and its (supposed) implementation in Canada as a path to Marxist transformation.  Discuss how my family has always understood the importance of controlling the banks.  Perhaps also discuss the importance of keeping them out of the hands of the Jews leading into another conversation about the "damn Jews."
             Mention that Martin's father also has "other sources" of funding as another reason it would be of interest to establish a relationship with the church.

[end of first meeting]


Some of this stuff could/should be thrown in by Elijah, I suppose, as we don't want him just sitting there.  Also, towards the end of this first meeting is where I could throw in the separate operation involving the gay aspect where Martin leaves the room and Elijah takes it from there.  I don't think the gay aspect is totally useless.  If we get Moss to condone and/or facilitate a married man cheating on his wife with gay guys (or Jeremiah Wright doing so), that would make national headlines in and of itself as he would likely be forced to resign as pastor.  On the other hand, even if it worked and we decided that would be counterproductive, we could bury it.
            Additional meetings could then be set up, if necessary, and arrangements could be made to bring in one or two of our pastors to introduce to Otis Moss.  Other meetings can be made with other pastors.  We could try to get a meeting with Jeremiah Wright.  Also at this point we would have the option of throwing in some explicitly illegal aspects to this whole affair.  I do think that simply the discussion alone, if it goes right, should be enough to make a big story.  However, if we can work a bribe or two into this, or some sort of child sex ring, we'll work on that.  We could also explore some of these other scenarios with different pastors if we feel we have everything we need on the Marxist issue from Otis Moss.

NJO: Accompanying email here. 

Source: Occupy For Accountabiliity and www.velvetrevolution.us. The date is an estimate.