Thursday, September 01, 2005

Inside the Mind of the Rutgers Professor, Part VII: Sex

Sex

The sexual revolution is a mess. While the professors accuse much literature of being racist, all is sexist. Feminists at Douglass College can’t decide whether they should support pornography for sexual liberation purposes or oppose it due to the degradation of women. They celebrate women’s sexual identity all the while espousing the absence of differences between men and women. The lesbian philosophy at Rutgers has been one of censorship rather than liberation, especially in relation to the grease trucks and the banning of The Medium in previous years. In summary, the Ladies Against Feminism, an anti-feminist group, says it best; “men and women are not identical creatures. Are we equal in human worth? Yes. Equal before the throne of grace? Absolutely. Equal in dignity? Indeed. But when it all boils down to it, if you insist that “equal” means exactly the same, you will have to fly in the face of biology, historical fact, Biblical truth and just plain common sense. In many ways, woman is not equal to man; and, by the same token, man is not equal to woman. They are different creatures with differing roles. Will we complement each other in our distinctive, God-given roles, or will we tear each other to shreds in a territorial dispute? L.A.F. promotes the former.”

NJO: Originally printed in the September 2005 issue of The Centurion.

No comments:

Post a Comment