Showing posts with label James sure does pick some raving bampots to work with. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James sure does pick some raving bampots to work with. Show all posts

Friday, October 28, 2016

"HIDDEN CAM: Media Matters Brags About Sabotaging Roger Stone"



Published on Oct 28, 2016
Project Veritas Action has released the sixth video in a multi-part series that is sending shockwaves through the DNC and the Clinton campaign. In a new video released by Project Veritas Action, a PVA journalist exposes how his pay for play with Robert Creamer landed him a meeting with Bradley Beychock, the President of Media Matters For America, an organization that has been attacking James O’Keefe for years.

During the meeting, Beychock gave the PVA journalist a tour of their offices. He also proudly boasted about the Media Matters assault on conservative writer and political consultant Roger Stone.

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Huma Abedin's Muslim Brotherhood Ties



Published on Dec 17, 2015
political insider James O'Keefe explains how the Hillary campaign wants illegals to flood the country before the election

NJO: Title, video and caption from The Alex Jones Channel.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Alex Jones & James O'Keefe: Political Prisoner Speaks Out Against Leftist Tyranny



Published on Jan 27, 2014
Project Veritas founder and author of Breakthrough James O'Keefe to discuss his latest undercover infiltration, in which he exposed deeply offensive comments made by members of Battleground Texas. He talks about the attacks he has had to endure just for using a camera.

NJO: Video and blurb from TheAlexJonesChannel.

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Saturday, January 16, 2010

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "The Structure of Video Activism"


NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, from January 2010, "The Structure of Video Activism".

Speech: The Structure of Video Activism
Ben Wetmore


1. figure out your values, and figure out what you want changed in the world
-easier said than done
-write out your values, write out your demands, it becomes a good action-list
-always a danger of mission creep
-many people get scared when things get dicey: anything controversial yields to the common man's temerity and anxiety. It's when people are afraid that it's most compelling, when you force them to take a side, when you make them physically uncomfortable, you force them to reset those careful mental equations they've constructed to live in a society with so many contradictions. Always force the common man to wipe the chalkboard clean and start anew.
-this keeps you focused.
-the dan Flynn rule that all channels about entertainment eventually become the E! television network. The desire for ratings, attention and popularity will always, inevitably, over time turn you into playboy/hustler magazine unless you have a solid foundation as to what your identity is, and so write out your principles and stick to them.
Practical example: neocons we were working with only wanted to do stuff about terrorism, they wanted to do all sorts of fabulous ridiculous and crazy things that I liked, but only on their topic, and they then became hostile to anything that wasn't advancing that agenda. The lack of an agenda will always eventually yield to a minority's serious agenda in time.
Practical application: write a mission statement and don't be afraid to be specific, then write out your demands. CM articles

2. pick a good and worthwhile target
-dont waste your time on bureaucrats/teachers/low-level people, strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter. Find the lever, find the man behind the curtain.
-pick one that's well known, someone worth dethroning. Don't waste your time with low-level pukes who are just pawns of the king.
-pick the target, personalize it, polarize it and perpetually hit harder.
-explain to people the way in which the target hurts them, the way in which they hurt real people. This takes creativity but fundamentally isn't difficult.
-don't be afraid to attack people the media tells you is on our side, some of the best satire is focused on people who never get attacked: i.e. the banks.
Practical example: SGA vs. Ladner;
Practical application: name the target and set the goal; you want Mayor Smith fired.
3. learn about the target, find out as much information as possible
-need an information network of sorts, need to be among the people
-you can't just start making accusations or just going off half-cocked
-good research skills usually involves a lot of reading and a lot of listening
-reconstruct a resume, look up lawsuits, make public records requests
-publish everything you find on a basic blog at blogger, don't hide your dirt, the left does this with all their targeted congressional targets; the wash post called me for dirt on ladner, and I told them I published it all, I didn't have much to add; most journalists never publish the good stuff they find, they leverage it for more access or use it to boost their prestige; most reporters are entirely awful human beings.
Practical example: james accidentally going to a pregnancy center asking for a racist donation for an abortion.
Practical application: make a menu of all the questions you want to have answered, and make a separate list of all the known places of potential information on your target.
4. identify and exploit their weakness
-with public figures, its the most common complaint everyone knows
-provide documentation to confirm the conventional wisdom: is he an alcoholic? is he a womanizer? is he a gambler? feed into their preconceived expectations.
-hypocrisy always sells; use their values against them; internalize the values and language of your ideological opponents, it breeds an amazing amount of confusion.
-read psychology/advertising/marketing and counterinsurgency books: influence by cialdini is the best.
-gossip is often half-true
Practical example: PP racism; dog abortion; LTPC ("you're the most progressive people here")
Practical application: understand your opponents and anticipate their reactions
5. structure the jokes and criticism
-make sure to get feedback, make sure your stuff is actually funny; major risk: inside jokes that aren't funny to anyone.
-most jokes are relatively simple and direct
-pop culture references are easy and people latch onto them like white on rice
-always use a prop: the prop focuses their attention: make the prop funny in itself (we spent hours talking just about props); always use a costume, but make it relevant, chicken costume/bailout story.
Past props:
bailout - big checks
ltpc - gays
Chicken costume - all stunts
Gay marriage - assless chaps
ACORN - pimp costume
-new type of humor: awkward moments, a la the office; LTPC: Anton's comment "well maybe you can learn"
Practical example: the gay marriage video doesn't have enough jokes
Practical application: write out the jokes about your subject that are actually funny to normal people, and make sure those jokes are easily understandable, don't hide the ball and don't depend on inside information.
6. find the natural allies and assess what they can do for you
-most of the time it's just word of mouth/marketing
-but it can also be additional people and volunteers
-they can also waste your time, so avoid the bitches: everyone has an opinion and none of them are useful.
Practical example: SFLA is sitting on dog abortion; SFLA staffers also needlessly delayed the PP-racism project on almost endless theological debates/disputes, some groups and some people will never be converted, just as you can't stop to kick every barking dog, you can't stop to engage and win over every dissenting group whose support is conditioned on them agreeing entirely with you, most of the time their assistance is only word of mouth anyway.
Practical application: write out the people who can help you, and what they can realistically provide. Don't ask them for more than that, and don't involve them more than that. It's a time-suck.
7. figure out your endgame
-a firing isn't enough, you want permanent systemic change; you don't want same shit different day.
-best example: Rome's solution to Carthage; Carthage delondo est.
-howard dean didn't run to win, he ran to build a movement, and he did a fabulous job. People laughed at Soros 'wasting' 500 mil. in 2004, but he used it to build a movement and institutions that changed the world. His goal was not the Presidency as much as it was the entire nation, that's an endgame.
-most people fail to dream big enough here, have big demands so that the compromises are still amazing
Practical example: Ladner's gone and his replacements are still there, there was never a period of denazification; ACORN will likely get refunded or just change names; don't get depressed about this but keep perspective and find a way to set your goals in such a way that makes their recovery impossible.
Practical application: have a few written major goals, the things that would change the world if things were different. Have major unrealistic goals, because realizing them is much more realistic than you think.
8. strike where they're weakest, don't let up at all
-remain formless and be immune from criticism, don't lie cheat or steal because they'll find out and it'll make you a magnet for criticism; look at the insane ways they criticize james, imagine if he had done something stupid-- it would have been fatal to the project.
-dont fall for the trap that it's honorable to leave them alone when they're down, when they're down, kick twice as hard
-use as many creative ways possible to 'expand the conflict' so that they're fighting on all fronts; most people have zero ability to counter humor and art, for example
-don't fight 'fair', fair is for losers, winners win.
-keep a hard heart, and remember that they kill babies for sport, don't feel bad for them.
-it's like half-treating a virus, it'll adapt and grow stronger and attack again; or a killer in a thriller movie, Jason is never really dead.
-always be the punisher, never forget and never forgive short of full conversions: Michael schiavo will always be a free man for having killed Terri, but who is lodging weekly disbarment motions against Judge Greer? Answer: no one.
Practical example: the GOP has almost given up on ACORN. People are weak and often give up. I found reasons to hate Ladner on such a strong visceral level that I never gave him the benefit of the doubt. AU/rape cover-up; Ladner/scholarship revocation, find someone to blame for your angst, and remember Eric Hoffer's observation about people's motivations about mass movements.
Practical application: when you have something hot, never let up. Create a fanatical desire within yourself to prevail. Identify your own catalytic passions and hold onto them, never let go. Be angry, but stay smart.
9. plan for the long-haul, keep expanding the conflict to other people until they give in
-even if you step away from the fight for a week or year, come back to it and keep the pressure on
-these people are weaker than you think, but they also have better lasting power even though that seems contradictory -- over time you will win, but it will seem like forever.
-over time people will believe whatever sincere critique you offer
-someone will ALWAYS say this STUPID line, "but, if you attack them, you only make them stronger." which is code for "I'm scared, so let's not do anything and lose, because I'm weak." - this is almost always a mistake. if you have nothing to do, attack. if you have something lame to do, attack. attack their weak points every chance you get. not only does this make you aggressive, but it tests you and refines your work. As well, you never know what great things will come from action. Action, action action!
Practical example: it took five years for Ladner to get removed; no one expected ACORN to get defunded - the support for the Iraq war, in summer of 2006 there was still a great deal of public support, but the public critique wore them down and evaporated support.
Practical application: Always take action. Call me when you get depressed or discouraged, we'll go for a drink and I'll cheer you up. The cost of this is that I expect the same arrangement.
10. market your idea and not yourself
-vanity will easily become so consuming that you lose sight of what made you interesting, keep focused on the project, on the work, on what matters
-vanity is very appealing
-use attractive women
-don't get caught up with controlling the media message, provide the content and keep it going
-when you become the issue, you're no longer effective. Remain formless.
-glory comes at the cost of effectiveness, or as Reagan said or was quoted as saying, "there's no limit to what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit."
Practical example: Lila/racism PP investigation; laura bush undercover op.
Practical application: Keep people around you who support you but who will give you serious feedback, and critical feedback, and actively solicit negative opinions and don't dismiss them. Imbue yourself with a culture of self-improvement.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "Center-right Moral Crusades: 'Get mad, get mad dog mad'"

NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, from November 2008, "Center-right Moral Crusades: 'Get mad, get mad dog mad'":

Too often those on the right are content to give charts, statistics and pristine figures for our arguments. We let the other side roll out fake grandmothers, women lying about recycling cans for food, fake claims of hate crimes and wonder why, even when these incidents are proven wrong time and time again, we keep losing to people. 
 
Only when one confronts a leftist who is screaming about the tragic death of Matthew Shepherd and points out that it had nothing to do with his homosexuality and everything to do with a drug deal gone wrong, does one understand the mentality of the other side. When they learn the truth they simply don't care, they keep screaming about hate crimes. 

So this isn't a claim to become as irrational as the other side, or merely to parrot back opposing moral outrage to our issues somewhat artificially. No, we ought to set our own real priorities, examine how the proposals on our side and theirs affect real people, and then apply real instances that have a strong emotional appeal for those who are not well educated on our topics. 

The emotional appeals can become a hook from which they learn the facts and the figures and statistics that show that our side is truthful and honest about these problems, but we can't forget that crucial middle point of attracting people in the first place through emotional appeals to become interested in our topics and solutions.
- issue - normal appeal - emotional appeal - leftist rebuttal - addressing their rebuttals
Affirmative Action
"fairness" and "merit"
Whites are pushed out; all races are taught to look down to blacks; blacks are set up to fail in jobs or in colleges they aren't ready for
minorities suffered through slavery, and now suffer through unequal access to advancement
slavery is about controlling someone's destiny, and now we have the state controlling and managing people's destinies due to race








Abortion
"Rights" of the unborn
The girl who survived an abortion: Gianna Jennssen
Back-alley abortions
Gianna survived a back-alley abortion, what does that make her?








Bureaucracy
Inefficiency
the
the
the








Business Regulation
"Overregulation"
the
the
the








Christian Assaults
"Freedom"
Attacks on nuns, hurting nuns
"Separation of Church and State"
The state is busy separating the Church from the people, hurting nuns and suing nuns








Taxation
"Individual rights" and "Capitalism"
Business owners who can't afford daycare
Poor people need our help
If poor people had jobs, they wouldn't be poor, and would be taxpayers








Environmentalism
High regulatory costs
Suffocation of new industry and the creation of new jobs for immigrants, minorities, the uninsured and poor people
the
the








Foreign Wars
Usually a mind-numbing pro-war, pro-bombing mentality that does us no good.
National bankruptcy; military deaths that will only lead to more future conflicts and, sadly, more deaths
Body bags
These wars come about because of Democrat policies, and Democrat weakening of the military








Immigration
"Border Security"
Crimes by immigrants, victims of border insecurity, sex crimes
Javier who "does the jobs white people won't take" and is just trying to earn money to send back home to Tijuana
the








Healthcare
"Socialism"
Deaths due to bureaucracy; elderly deaths due to rationing; denial of care
The "Uninsured"
the








Tuition
Needless bureaucratic growth
Tuition slavery as undergraduates spend ten years paying off debt
Student "services" the
topics we ought to be worked up over:

Abortion
Abortion activism
Abortion healing
Academic standards
Alternative media
Courtship
Homosexual therapy
Marriage
Tuition
Unionism

and we should develop ways to do grassroots organizing around these topics

leftists organize around:
Domestic violence
Racism
Sexism

Friday, November 21, 2008

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "Restructuring Leftist's Fancy Language"


NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

On this day, "Restructuring Leftist's Fancy Language [sic]":


If you read enough leftist literature, especially college-oriented texts, you find a variety of words that only make sense in context, ones that you've never heard in normal conversation. Such gems as "heterosexist" and "pseudovalues" or "moral pathologies" or "neocolonization" are bandied about as though, well, as though they're real words.
 
And God bless these leftists, they are incapable of producing one dollar worth of real value, or "value" to our postmodern readers, to the economy but are remarkably creative and productive when it comes to making up words, or, bear with me, "pro-neovernacular construction."

And while these leftists are busy making up new words, we're faced with the challenge of figuring out what the hell they mean, and also dealing with the inherent connotations that these new words bring. We're always playing defense! We ought to go out of our way to define their crazy thoughts with the same flair that they obviously enjoy ridiculing our principles.

This exercise is also pertinent to the longer discussion about the tactics of pivot-point and also the Leesburg grid.

So, in the pro-neovernacular constructionist spirit, we've listed out some fancy new words to describe leftists on the left and would love to hear any input or suggestions that you might have to add to, amend or correct any of the words and phrases. As you can see, we could always use the simple answers to describe them, but the fancy language just makes it sound so much better.


- their fancy language - normal language - our fancy language -
Marxist Thief neocollectivist rationalizer
Queer Pervert anal-centric hypersexualist
Pro-"Choice" Pro-Abortion infant termination apologists
Clinic Doctor Abortionist infant terminator
Feminist Man-hater Woeman - antiphallic gender discriminator
Postmodernist Idiotic pro-definitionless
Relativist Coward subjectivist
Deconstructionist Whiner academically intolerant
Religious Hater Atheist deistiphobic
Communist Red Bastard Genocidal communitarian
Lesbians Dykes vaginal hypersexualist
Pornographers Degenerates sexual addict and social sexual infector
Neoconservative Liberal Democratic Imperialist
Radical Blacks Uppity Afrikan reinventionist
Racial Instigators Outside Agitators Corporate racialists
Modernists Modernists Ageists - elderly intolerant

Friday, October 31, 2008

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "One recent crazy night"


NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, from November 2008, "One recent crazy night":

A friend asked me to go record a meeting of radical homosexuals at a public meeting, and so I went. It was held at a government high school, after-hours, and the discussion of choice was on how best to structure homosexual activities in middle and high schools. I drove up and parked, walked inside and had a hard time discerning where to go. I saw a man walking with purpose, and decided to ask him. I asked him if he knew where the meeting was being held, and he prompted me to give him which one it was. I told him it was the GLBT one, and he prodded further. It seemed as though he wanted to screen me to see if I was actually going to the meeting or if I was an outsider. After I passed his informal test, he said he was going that way and that I could walk with him.

He was an older man, and the perfect expression of every stereotype of government school administration. He had an underlying personal tension, and his skin even had that awkward dark tint of a man in small authority. His short white hair were little yardsticks of his creativity, suffocated no doubt from years of bureaucracy. It feels awkward to write that, since I'm sure he's a 'good man' and 'everyone around him likes him' and it's uncouth to talk of people in such a way. However, he was also going to give the welcome to a group of people spreading perversion to kids, so I don't feel too bad about it.

As we walked, he asked me what all the initials meant. Never once in my life have I been hit on by homosexuals nor been confused for one, so I tried my best to play along. I avoided being too over the top with the lisp though, not because it's inaccurate, rather, I just didn't think I could pull it off.

I sat down in a cafeteria and tried to look busy. I had arrived early, and the head organizer approached me, surely I looked suspicious. She was nice, but was clearly probing for who I was with. I said half-truthfully that I was writing a story and a part-time journalist. She then left me, as I sat in this long awkwardly extended rectangular cafeteria and proceeded to deal with the refreshments.

Time passed and no one arrived. I thought it odd. Then I realized that everyone had left. The meeting was elsewhere and they decided to leave me in the cold. I wandered around the school for a while, pacing the linoleum, breathing in that strong cleaning agent that every school overuses, and passed the empty classrooms looking for the room I was supposed to be in. I covered almost the entire school, and was about to leave when I saw a very obviously gay man enter the building.

I decided to follow him.

He was lost as well, however, and he was even a speaker. We ran into the same principal and he gave us better directions. Together we walked to the right room, through the maze of the needlessly complex laid out school.

I arrived at the right room, finally, only about 15 minutes late. I entered a room full of homosexuals and transsexuals. They were of all ages, older, middle-aged, younger and even, sadly, high schoolers. I sat there as comfortably as I could, awkward from the environment and also from those tiny blue chairs that all schools buy. In a room full of perverts I started dissecting my own sexuality. A degree of introspection that I can't turn off kept racing in my head and I thought about my similarities to this group rather than my obvious differences.

They were fellow human beings, deserving of respect and rights. But they had serious problems as well. The several men dressed as women and women who had been surgically altered to be men clarified my mental confusion. But, strangely, even sitting there realizing that they were all perverted, I started identifying with them after a time. My own little Stockholm syndrome kicked on surprisingly fast. It's such an amazing topic to politicize and publicize, that I think it lends itself to conversions so easier.

These groups and these interests never promote stable sexual behaviors or lifestyles. The Theology of the Body, a popular Catholic teaching about sexuality, never enters their minds. If abstinence is taught, it's presented as a joke, as something totally unrealistic. Rather, one's taught to do whatever feels good, and to treat the symptoms later, never the disease. In the case of AIDS, that becomes literally true: don't adjust your behavior, agitate for cures to the disease because the behaviors can't be changed.

Which isn't even to say that homosexual behavior must be changed. But if homosexual partners were monogamous and faithful, there would be a next to zero chance to catch AIDS.

One's sexuality is at the core of their identity, and yet so unthought of, so taken for granted. Homosexuals say that and mean that one should 'question' it and eventually become homosexual. I mean that in the sense that stability and order exists because most of us don't question it, and probably shouldn't. So many questions have unfirm answers, and the process of asking a question can lead to doubt. For instance: if you trust someone 100%, and someone asks if you've heard that they've stolen from someone, even though you may still trust them, your trust was never the same. Simply the act of asking the question has changed your opinion. Such is the affect of suggestion, something this group has mastered.

I sat for 90 minutes as they talked about increasing the number of gay-straight alliance groups in high schools, middle schools, and further 'improving' the curriculum in elementary schools. The power of suggestion to tell 11 year old kids that perhaps they're "different" because they're gay.

No, I have nothing in common with these people. And after realizing and appreciating what was going on, it became quite easy to retain my resolve.