Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Planned Parenthood. Show all posts

Monday, October 31, 2016

"Democratic Pollster Celinda Lake Tells Union Workers To Lie To Voters"



Published on Oct 31, 2016
In this video, Democratic pollster Celinda Lake encourages union workers to lie to voters on specific issues because the Democrats are behind the Republicans at the moment and are "in trouble."

Lake was a general consultant for Bill Clinton and has since worked with the DNC, AFL-CIO, Planned Parenthood, Joe Biden, and Nancy Pelosi.

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

James O'Keefe Speaks on National Review Panel



Published on Jul 23, 2015
Project Veritas President James O'Keefe speaks about the First Amendment on a National Review panel where he is joined by fellow journalists Mary Katharine Ham, Andrew Klavin, Charles Cooke, and Jim Geraghty.

Website: http://projectveritas.com/
Donate: http://projectveritas.com/donate
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Quote Boat: Again with the war talk --- Think this guy might be a fanatic or something?



NJO: I haven't as yet posted a link to the James O'Keefe-connected Planned Parenthood sting video that appeared last week, so here's a timely reminder of James O'Keefe's thoughts on how to journalistically cover reproductive healthcare organizations like Planned Parenthood, and links to Little Green Footballs and Snopes, who have dealt with the story properly.

Update: Quote source.

Friday, August 13, 2010

James O'Keefe on G.K. Chesterton and "The Free Press"



NJO: Title, video and caption from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Uploaded on Aug 12, 2010
"Video courtesy of American Chesterton Society and Doug Jackson." http://chesterton.org/

Blurb from theprojectveritas.com:
Speech at 29th Annual G.K. Chesterton Conference
Aug 13 2010
On August 6th, I was privileged to give a talk on the importance of undercover journalism vs. stenography – what the mainstream media usually does.

Transcript from freerepublic.com but originally from projectveritas.com:
Transcript of James O'Keefe speech to the G.K. Chesterton society at Mount St. Mary's in Maryland

Project Veritas ^ | Aug. 13 2010 | James O'Keefe

Karl Marx said that philosophers have explained the world; it is our job to change it. I say Chesterton has explained what's wrong with the wrong; it is our job to restore it.

A specter is haunting the powerful and the corrupt, and that is the specter of the independent, free, renegade video journalist. That journalist seeks to correct the wrongs of the society we live in. There is a lot wrong with the society we live in. Chesterton says, [paraphrasing] "The position we now have reached is this. Starting from the state, we try to remedy the failures of all the families, all the nurseries, all the workshops, all the secondary institutions that once had some authority of their own. Everything is ultimately brought into the courts." It seems like the world has become one giant divorce court.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "The Structure of Video Activism"


NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, from January 2010, "The Structure of Video Activism".

Speech: The Structure of Video Activism
Ben Wetmore


1. figure out your values, and figure out what you want changed in the world
-easier said than done
-write out your values, write out your demands, it becomes a good action-list
-always a danger of mission creep
-many people get scared when things get dicey: anything controversial yields to the common man's temerity and anxiety. It's when people are afraid that it's most compelling, when you force them to take a side, when you make them physically uncomfortable, you force them to reset those careful mental equations they've constructed to live in a society with so many contradictions. Always force the common man to wipe the chalkboard clean and start anew.
-this keeps you focused.
-the dan Flynn rule that all channels about entertainment eventually become the E! television network. The desire for ratings, attention and popularity will always, inevitably, over time turn you into playboy/hustler magazine unless you have a solid foundation as to what your identity is, and so write out your principles and stick to them.
Practical example: neocons we were working with only wanted to do stuff about terrorism, they wanted to do all sorts of fabulous ridiculous and crazy things that I liked, but only on their topic, and they then became hostile to anything that wasn't advancing that agenda. The lack of an agenda will always eventually yield to a minority's serious agenda in time.
Practical application: write a mission statement and don't be afraid to be specific, then write out your demands. CM articles

2. pick a good and worthwhile target
-dont waste your time on bureaucrats/teachers/low-level people, strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter. Find the lever, find the man behind the curtain.
-pick one that's well known, someone worth dethroning. Don't waste your time with low-level pukes who are just pawns of the king.
-pick the target, personalize it, polarize it and perpetually hit harder.
-explain to people the way in which the target hurts them, the way in which they hurt real people. This takes creativity but fundamentally isn't difficult.
-don't be afraid to attack people the media tells you is on our side, some of the best satire is focused on people who never get attacked: i.e. the banks.
Practical example: SGA vs. Ladner;
Practical application: name the target and set the goal; you want Mayor Smith fired.
3. learn about the target, find out as much information as possible
-need an information network of sorts, need to be among the people
-you can't just start making accusations or just going off half-cocked
-good research skills usually involves a lot of reading and a lot of listening
-reconstruct a resume, look up lawsuits, make public records requests
-publish everything you find on a basic blog at blogger, don't hide your dirt, the left does this with all their targeted congressional targets; the wash post called me for dirt on ladner, and I told them I published it all, I didn't have much to add; most journalists never publish the good stuff they find, they leverage it for more access or use it to boost their prestige; most reporters are entirely awful human beings.
Practical example: james accidentally going to a pregnancy center asking for a racist donation for an abortion.
Practical application: make a menu of all the questions you want to have answered, and make a separate list of all the known places of potential information on your target.
4. identify and exploit their weakness
-with public figures, its the most common complaint everyone knows
-provide documentation to confirm the conventional wisdom: is he an alcoholic? is he a womanizer? is he a gambler? feed into their preconceived expectations.
-hypocrisy always sells; use their values against them; internalize the values and language of your ideological opponents, it breeds an amazing amount of confusion.
-read psychology/advertising/marketing and counterinsurgency books: influence by cialdini is the best.
-gossip is often half-true
Practical example: PP racism; dog abortion; LTPC ("you're the most progressive people here")
Practical application: understand your opponents and anticipate their reactions
5. structure the jokes and criticism
-make sure to get feedback, make sure your stuff is actually funny; major risk: inside jokes that aren't funny to anyone.
-most jokes are relatively simple and direct
-pop culture references are easy and people latch onto them like white on rice
-always use a prop: the prop focuses their attention: make the prop funny in itself (we spent hours talking just about props); always use a costume, but make it relevant, chicken costume/bailout story.
Past props:
bailout - big checks
ltpc - gays
Chicken costume - all stunts
Gay marriage - assless chaps
ACORN - pimp costume
-new type of humor: awkward moments, a la the office; LTPC: Anton's comment "well maybe you can learn"
Practical example: the gay marriage video doesn't have enough jokes
Practical application: write out the jokes about your subject that are actually funny to normal people, and make sure those jokes are easily understandable, don't hide the ball and don't depend on inside information.
6. find the natural allies and assess what they can do for you
-most of the time it's just word of mouth/marketing
-but it can also be additional people and volunteers
-they can also waste your time, so avoid the bitches: everyone has an opinion and none of them are useful.
Practical example: SFLA is sitting on dog abortion; SFLA staffers also needlessly delayed the PP-racism project on almost endless theological debates/disputes, some groups and some people will never be converted, just as you can't stop to kick every barking dog, you can't stop to engage and win over every dissenting group whose support is conditioned on them agreeing entirely with you, most of the time their assistance is only word of mouth anyway.
Practical application: write out the people who can help you, and what they can realistically provide. Don't ask them for more than that, and don't involve them more than that. It's a time-suck.
7. figure out your endgame
-a firing isn't enough, you want permanent systemic change; you don't want same shit different day.
-best example: Rome's solution to Carthage; Carthage delondo est.
-howard dean didn't run to win, he ran to build a movement, and he did a fabulous job. People laughed at Soros 'wasting' 500 mil. in 2004, but he used it to build a movement and institutions that changed the world. His goal was not the Presidency as much as it was the entire nation, that's an endgame.
-most people fail to dream big enough here, have big demands so that the compromises are still amazing
Practical example: Ladner's gone and his replacements are still there, there was never a period of denazification; ACORN will likely get refunded or just change names; don't get depressed about this but keep perspective and find a way to set your goals in such a way that makes their recovery impossible.
Practical application: have a few written major goals, the things that would change the world if things were different. Have major unrealistic goals, because realizing them is much more realistic than you think.
8. strike where they're weakest, don't let up at all
-remain formless and be immune from criticism, don't lie cheat or steal because they'll find out and it'll make you a magnet for criticism; look at the insane ways they criticize james, imagine if he had done something stupid-- it would have been fatal to the project.
-dont fall for the trap that it's honorable to leave them alone when they're down, when they're down, kick twice as hard
-use as many creative ways possible to 'expand the conflict' so that they're fighting on all fronts; most people have zero ability to counter humor and art, for example
-don't fight 'fair', fair is for losers, winners win.
-keep a hard heart, and remember that they kill babies for sport, don't feel bad for them.
-it's like half-treating a virus, it'll adapt and grow stronger and attack again; or a killer in a thriller movie, Jason is never really dead.
-always be the punisher, never forget and never forgive short of full conversions: Michael schiavo will always be a free man for having killed Terri, but who is lodging weekly disbarment motions against Judge Greer? Answer: no one.
Practical example: the GOP has almost given up on ACORN. People are weak and often give up. I found reasons to hate Ladner on such a strong visceral level that I never gave him the benefit of the doubt. AU/rape cover-up; Ladner/scholarship revocation, find someone to blame for your angst, and remember Eric Hoffer's observation about people's motivations about mass movements.
Practical application: when you have something hot, never let up. Create a fanatical desire within yourself to prevail. Identify your own catalytic passions and hold onto them, never let go. Be angry, but stay smart.
9. plan for the long-haul, keep expanding the conflict to other people until they give in
-even if you step away from the fight for a week or year, come back to it and keep the pressure on
-these people are weaker than you think, but they also have better lasting power even though that seems contradictory -- over time you will win, but it will seem like forever.
-over time people will believe whatever sincere critique you offer
-someone will ALWAYS say this STUPID line, "but, if you attack them, you only make them stronger." which is code for "I'm scared, so let's not do anything and lose, because I'm weak." - this is almost always a mistake. if you have nothing to do, attack. if you have something lame to do, attack. attack their weak points every chance you get. not only does this make you aggressive, but it tests you and refines your work. As well, you never know what great things will come from action. Action, action action!
Practical example: it took five years for Ladner to get removed; no one expected ACORN to get defunded - the support for the Iraq war, in summer of 2006 there was still a great deal of public support, but the public critique wore them down and evaporated support.
Practical application: Always take action. Call me when you get depressed or discouraged, we'll go for a drink and I'll cheer you up. The cost of this is that I expect the same arrangement.
10. market your idea and not yourself
-vanity will easily become so consuming that you lose sight of what made you interesting, keep focused on the project, on the work, on what matters
-vanity is very appealing
-use attractive women
-don't get caught up with controlling the media message, provide the content and keep it going
-when you become the issue, you're no longer effective. Remain formless.
-glory comes at the cost of effectiveness, or as Reagan said or was quoted as saying, "there's no limit to what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit."
Practical example: Lila/racism PP investigation; laura bush undercover op.
Practical application: Keep people around you who support you but who will give you serious feedback, and critical feedback, and actively solicit negative opinions and don't dismiss them. Imbue yourself with a culture of self-improvement.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Pro-life activists not ashamed to use the tactics of the Left against them


By James O’Keefe

In February 2008, Lila Rose and I released our second undercover investigation of Planned Parenthood. We were able to donate money to the organization for the explicit purpose of reducing the number of black babies born in the United States – in line with the intentions of Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger.We carefully chose a dozen or so “one party consent” states, where it is legal to audio record someone without their consent. Not a single Planned Parenthood employee we spoke to was disinterested in the prospect of a donation for our stated purposes. We asked that our donation to be earmarked for minority mothers only. Autumn Kersey, vice president of development for the Idaho division of Planned Parenthood, actually confessed she was “excited” about the donation. We received nationwide news coverage for our sting operation and put Planned Parenthood on the defensive because of its advocacy of black genocide.

While many pro-life organizations across the country continue focusing on development, this investigation was far more effective, as it managed to expose Planned Parenthood’s original intentions and raise awareness using telephones and a public university’s video editing program.

This kind of political technology needs to be further utilized by young conservative activists. When I was editor of The Rutgers Centurion, the conservative newspaper at Rutgers University in New Jersey, I convinced administrators to ban Lucky Charms cereal on the grounds it is offensive to Irish Americans. This was done to satirize political correctness on campuses, using what legendary leftist activist Saul Alinsky called the most effective political tactic of all – mockery. It was a win-win scenario: If they did not ban Lucky Charms, they would appear to be biased against Irish Americans. If they did, they would be branded as ridiculously sensitive, as was the case. Likewise, either Planned Parenthood accepts donations from racists, or they must reject the view of their founder, Sanger, as racist.

We framed the issue in a creative way. We did not tackle abortion conventionally but from the racism angle. Because leftists believe that racism is a cardinal sin, we used their rules against them.

Alinsky believed in doing whatever necessary to disrupt and annoy power structures, applying constant pressure and opposition. Applying some of his tactics from “Rules for Radicals,” we (a) never went outside our own experience, (b) went outside our opposition’s experience, (c) used enjoyable tactics and did not spend too long on any particular one and (d) made people believe we were a 1,000 member coordinated conspiracy when there are really only three of us. Many in the pro-life movement criticize using deceit in exposing the racism and absurdity in the abortion movement, but are willing to condemn Planned Parenthood for what we exposed utilizing those tactics.

Many students around the country have nodded in agreement with my theories on activism, but they fear doing what it takes to make them happen. The movement dies when it becomes boring and risk-averse. The hardest part about being a leader is getting people to focus on action in addition to philosophy. If you must spend time “convincing” anyone of anything, it is that they owe it to their philosophy to take action. In the pro-life movement it has been particularly difficult to find people to believe in these tactics, or have the courage to use them.

Leaders taking on power structures need to be raw, confident, fearless and impermeable. Lila received a letter threatening to prosecute the group for violating wiretapping laws, but it did not stop her from continuing the investigation. After the investigation aired nationally on Fox News, Planned Parenthood could no longer press charges, as Lila would appear the victim.

Activists should always be forward thinking and compound successes immediately. For example, pro-life activists across the country could easily replicate our racism project locally by demanding Planned Parenthood be banned from their respective community or campus. “Shut down Planned Parenthood because abortion is murder,” simply will not work. The demand should frame the issue in leftist terms, making it harder to say no. It could be something like “We strongly oppose racism at Springfield State. To honor Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy, we demand that Planned Parenthood be disaffiliated from campus.” It will be very hard for a town or campus bureaucrat to say “no” to anything that claims to honor MLK Jr.

Most importantly, conservative activists need to be their own media, and use their independent media to obtain their goals. In our situation, You Tube decided to arbitrarily ban Part II of our investigation, which had received tens of thousands of views, because it violated the “Terms of Use.” To my knowledge there was nothing in our videos that constituted a violation. We were more likely targeted due to our message, considering that there are millions of other videos that break copyright laws or contain sexual or violent material that are ignored. It is crucial to maintain independent broadcasting capabilities in print and online to get the word out.

The media coverage gained from our investigations is fun but fleeting. Media is unfortunately thought to be an end, but it should be a means. The purpose of our investigation was not just to get on Fox News but to get Planned Parenthood banned from UCLA. If we are successful, this story will likely make the Los Angeles Times and Larry King Live. This would, in turn, encourage others and lead to results so significant across the country that the mainstream media will not be able to ignore them.

Through all of this, your purpose and goal must be clear. We are not doing this just for fun or to embarrass Planned Parenthood; we want to stop them from continuing their murderous activities once and for all. 


NJO: This was originally posted at newguardmag08.blogspot.com.

 

Friday, October 10, 2008

Cecile Richards Sings Brass in Pocket



NJO: Video and blurb from James O'Keefe's personal YouTube account at http://www.youtube.com/user/featherofsteel‎.

Uploaded on Oct 10, 2008
Planned Parenthood President sings Brass in Pocket Celebrating her Career Killing Kids

Friday, August 22, 2008

The Gospel According to O'Keefe

 

NJO: The following post was originally blogged at insurgentvisuals.blogspot.com on August 22, 2008.

(James sent me a note he wrote to a friend. I was so touched by its words that I felt compelled to post it here. It captures so much of what I've felt and thought lately, that I was shocked to read it from him. His words inflate, they command, they inspire, they move. I hope you feel the same way. As usual, I did this without permission, so I tried to remove things that would identify the intended recipient. -Ben)



Hey,

How are you doing? I got your message about the LGBT and the Lavender at <your college="">. Can you tell me me about that? I've specialized in dealing with these types of issues on college campuses. Recently I've asked God to use me in whatever capacity He sees fit, and I've been reading through the Bible, especially proverbs, as well as many other books about career choices and decisions.</your>

One thing that struck me in your email below was what you said :

"I fault people for focusing on this so much that it puts other issues (usually of greater importance) on the backburner. Politicians love the issue of abortion as it causes a deadlock. I believe this to be deception on the part of satan for his other agendas. This is just my opinion on the matter."

<friend>, Politicians may love the issue of abortion for their own selfish reasons, but abortion is THE priority of our time. As you know, If we can not all agree on the sanctity of innocent life, then there is nothing worth agreeing about. If it isn't wrong to kill innocent babies, then what could possibly be wrong. As my friend Dave pointed out to me last night, this is a holy war; a war between all the religions of the world and none. Between the sacredness of life, and the systematic destruction of life. If Satan is doing anything, he is preventing the Good people of the world from taking action to support the least of his fellow man. Many Christians I have met have shied away from this issue because it is a difficult, uncomfortable issue, but to me this is the issue of our time; and I believe Christ looks to our action on this abortion issue, and our courage in confronting it, yes, even at the sacrifice of other issues, at the sacrifice of our jobs, of our lives.</friend>

Keep in the mind the passage in Matthew:::

"For I was hungry and gave you Me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink. I was a stranger and you did not welcome Me, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me." Then they will answer, "Lord, When did we see Thee hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to Thee?" Then He will answer them, "Truly, I say to you, as you did it not to one of the least of my brethren, you did it not to me."

Christ's words here in Matthew are radical— more radical than anything written in all the political books I've ever read. And they are more loving, infinitely more loving than the secular or perverted love presented to me by the masses – that says philanthropy or love of our fellow man is a thing to be distinguished from Christ. We must "Give." "Do." "Clothe." "Welcome." "Visit" for the Christ present in the least of our brethren neighbors. This will take more than chastity, it will take charity; it will take more than temperance, it will take action, practice, proactive struggle and the sacrifice of fame and status. It will take immediacy and prioritization. It will require us to make essential distinctions about what is important. In some cases loving will entail forfeiture of our life, liberty, or property for people that have none of the above. We must come to know and love God in all people and things, but especially in "the least of our brethren." Not just to those we have wronged, or to whom we were unkind, but on behalf of people we have neglected through lack of action; People we see and ignore; the miserable, the sorrowful, the defenseless, the diseased; the helpless, the physically weak, the spiritually devoid. We are tempted to call them rich or say they are undeserving of our love. But this doesn't change the fact we see they are poor. We know Christ has already given us this power to determine what is essential. When we neglect or ignore these starving, these sick, these naked, these imprisoned, we neglect or ignore Christ himself. Christ stands amongst his voiceless children in the Kingdom of heaven asking when we arrive "how much do you love me?" He will look to our faith. He will look to how we demonstrate that faith. Wherever there is suffering in humanity, Christ is calling. He is asking us to show Him how much we are willing to love. He is asking us to demonstrate our love by curing the people made in his image; after all, all of this is made in God's image. He tells us our eternity is at stake. Thus we must act, and we must act now because our judgment could come later today, and many of us will be left immediately begging for mercy and more time – to do the things that must be done.

I can imagine an infinite number of callings in which you all can practice your love for humanity. Perhaps philanthropy, perhaps missionary, civil rights, teaching, innovation, etc. Maybe all of the above. We (Myself and anyone else who comes forward) have found out calling, so God help us

But for me, applied love has seemed to be a resistance; I find myself wanting to show my love by being in radical opposition to the powerful institutions of today. First it was colleges which perverted truth. Then courts which have perverted law. And most recently a Planned Parenthood organization which has convinced arguably the most powerless black American class of human beings that killing their children will help that class' cause. God has opened my eyes to a holocaust; colleges that sponsor it, newspapers and magazines that willingly ignore proof of it , court justices making up laws to uphold it. And yet as I read Matthew, and thought about "what's wrong with the world" and asked earnestly what Christ meant, tears streamed down from my eyes because powerful forces within me reinforced what I already knew to be true. . Our world doubts its own capacity for love, distorts love, the most awful perversion. As evidence by calling a ban on killing "authoritarianism," – as evidenced by, for example, a pastor emailing the Advocate stating we are acting immorally in our investigation. The pastor, and millions of Christians who agree with him, might want to reread the book of Matthew, Christ's request, and what love means to them, in the deepest of places. Thousands of a deaths a day, and he chooses to attack us.

We, in our specific calling, refuse to apologize.

We, in our specific calling, make it our responsibility to change their spiritual leanings before judgment day. Abortion, birth control, premature legislation and a deceptive media have created a paradigm where most are convinced Planned Parenthood seeks to foster a supportive environment for black people when it destroys black children for the sake of a "better environment." In the womb, lay the strangers Christ spoke of, Margaret Sangers' "unwanted," "unloved," who will grow up "POOR" and therefore must be eliminated, for the sake of a better society and a better world. It was once possible, then it became inevitable. Now the question is how many lives can we save.

We, in our specific calling, have also learned that civil discourse accomplishes nothing; logic is no weapon against them, with discourse there is no freeing, no results, no clothing, no visiting, there is only killing. We can not "forgive" the perversion of love, the perversion of meaning, when we are all be subject to judgment and considered the purveyors of death. This truth will not disappear simply by Christians refusing to confront and stop injustice, or hide from it.

Nor will we allow someone who isn't Christian to prevent us from speaking to a non-Christian from our hearts. We may talk past them, but it is precisely when we do share the truth and talk past them, standing our ground we are on the path to helping our brethren, and setting others free. We will talk using our language until the death, so at least we can go to Christ, knowing we did not back down.

We, in our specific calling, can only get access to the abortionists' chambers and record the remark that will further harm their organization by deceiving them about my purpose, my age, her age, my intent.

We, in our specific calling, can only infiltrate the newsprint propaganda through alternative video. A thousand Christians trumpet how immoral or illwilled or inartistic or unstylized the video is. Some of the Christians praise the video style at length, and the media spotlights earned for its own sake, only to move onto another story, another day, another topic that is more stylized. A handful tally the 200,000 people and counting learning for the first time that Planned Parenthood was founded on Eugenics purposes. And of those how many see this the core motive and twisted ideology that abortion is even based on?

A pro-life Christian friend of mine, in our specific calling, will drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes, while lying and pretending to be pregnant. Potentially, this psychological trick will permit us to make a Youtube video admist A group of Christians fresh from their bible study lessons on truth, eternity, and faith, will lament that we violated a campus policy of drinking

The question is not whether "the ends justify the means" The question is Saving lives (and thus God's image) justifies deceiving the very evil that is destroying those lives (and God's image).

Christ gives us the answer. And in the pit of my soul I must take a leap of faith and love my brethren.


- James



NJO: The above post was originally blogged at insurgentvisuals.blogspot.com on August 22, 2008. If you follow that link, you'll see that there are three names listed as contributors to that defunct blogspot: James O'Keefe, Bruce Bronson and ".", with the posts made by ".", as can be further attested in this article at Crooks and Liars. Here the person posting identifies himself as "Ben". The note from "James" that he presents is filled with telltale signs of sloppy editing, e.g. incomplete sentences, lack of correct punctuation etc. As Ben says, he "tried to remove things that would identify the intended recipient".

Okay, firstly... why do I think Insurgent Visuals James O'Keefe and Feathers of Steel James O'Keefe are the same person?

A number of reasons.

One, Insurgent Visuals James is ardently anti- a woman's right to choose abortion and so is Feathers of Steel James.

Two, Insurgent Visuals James talks about his "radical opposition to the powerful institutions of today", which he lists chronologically as colleges, courts, and then Planned Parenthood. This is consistent with Feathers of Steel James' trajectory through college to law school, and then while at law school, helping to form the anti-Planned Parenthood organization Live Action.

Three, Insurgent Visuals James is party to something called "the Advocate". Feathers of Steel James' history with Live Action and its publication The Advocate is well documented; also, the date of the post is concurrent with this chapter of his life.

Four, Insurgent Visuals James talks about making videos with the goal of harming organizations that provide abortions, just like what Feathers of Steel James has a history of doing.

Five, Insurgent Visuals James is happy enough to tell lies in furtherance of his goals and so is Feathers of Steel James.

Next, I think there's good reason to believe that the two other guys involved in this short-lived blog, identified as
"Ben" and "Bruce Bronson", are James O'Keefe's associates Benjamin R. Wetmore and Jonathon Christian Burns respectively. Ben Wetmore was a staffer and field rep for Morton Blackwell's Leadership Institute circa 2002 to 2006. James (who attended some Leadership Institute courses in 2005 and was one of its field reps in 2007) would later refer to him as "a mentor of mine; a genius". Another reason to think "Ben" is Ben Wetmore is his fannish mention of artists John "Borf" Tsombikos and Banksy in another post on the Insurgent Visuals blog. This photo from Ben Wetmore's Picasa Web Albums account, in an album titled "My Place", has these two listed on a note as "Artists I like":


Jonathon Burns (a.k.a. John Burns) attended some Leadership Institute courses circa 2004 and would later be a founding member of the St Louis Tea Party. According to this blog post by Wetmore (mirrored here), his friend Jon Christian Burns is "soaked in the moral clarity of numerous Mr. Bruce Willis and Mr. Charles Bronson movies". This, along with Burns' resemblance to the grinning stencilized visage in the Insurgent Visuals logo and the Leadership Institute background he shares with Wetmore and O'Keefe, is what leads me to think that "Bruce Bronson" is he.

Both have collaborated with James O'Keefe on several projects; I've made use of tags on this blog to denote exactly which ones. Two examples of projects that involved all three of them are the CNN Caper (2010) and the Bailout Prize Patrol video (2009).

Now, all this fuss I'm making about the fascinating matter of who exactly was involved in making this one half-assed little blog in 2008 does actually have a conclusion that it's warming up to, so bear with me. See, some time later, in 2011, a journalistic group calling itself Insurgent Visuals would get its name mentioned in the Missouri press as the mysterious (ie. sketchy, fake, not a real journalistic group at all) purveyor and promoter of a series of videos culled from 30 hours of lecture footage from the University of Missouri St Louis downloaded by student Phil Christofanelli, as part of an Andrew Breitbart-backed smear campaign against the lecturers of a Labor Studies course. This incarnation of Insurgent Visuals had a short-lived website at insurgentvisuals.com (plus a new and similarly short-lived Blogger account, and a Facebook account, a YouTube account, a Vimeo account, and a Twitter), which listed staffers by the names of "Jim O." and "Bruce B.", featured some mock-Soviet-style graphics similar to what Ben Wetmore has a history of creating and posting on his websites, and which was registered, according to Whois Lookup, on April 26, 2011 by one Jonathon Burns. Furthermore, Jon Burns is from St Louis and James O'Keefe had spent some time in St Louis in late 2009, being involved in some Tea Party events along with Burns. So could it have been one or more of these three guys behind the 2011 smear? I would call that a distinct possibility.

(Updated 30th September 2015 to include the fake HTML tags that appear in the source code of the original page.)

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

LiveActionFilms: New Mexico: Planned Parenthood Racism Investigation



Video and blurb from YouTube channel LiveActionFilms.

Uploaded on Apr 2, 2008
Planned Parenthood of New Mexico agrees to accept money from a Live Action member posing as a racist donor who wants to target African-Americans for abortions because he thinks "there are way too many blacks in America".

African American women account for only 12% of the female population but submit to over 36% of abortions.
1,400 African American babies are lost to abortion each day.

This is no accident: Planned Parenthood targets minorities, concentrating their clinics in minority neighborhoods. Their founder, Margaret Sanger, designed the organization to use sterilization and abortion to control minority populations. And today, Planned Parenthood of America sets up special funds across the country to target minority women.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Rush Limbaugh on Planned Parenthood Racism



NJO: Video and caption from James O'Keefe's personal YouTube account at http://www.youtube.com/user/featherofsteel‎.

Uploaded on Feb 29, 2008
Rush Limbaugh on UCLA Racism Investigation into Planned Parenthood

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Facing Life Head-On, S2 Ep10: Reproductive Racism





Uploaded on Jan 23, 2008
Is there a hidden racist agenda behind Planned Parenthood's services? This episode covers two college students quest to find out the answer.

Friday, November 09, 2007

LiveActionFilms: Planned Parenthood Manipulative Counseling



Video and blurb from YouTube channel LiveActionFilms.

Uploaded on Nov 9, 2007
Santa Monica Planned Parenthood employee tells 15 year old impregnated by 23 year old that if she could "do it again" regarding her 17 year old son, "I would not continue the pregnancy."

LiveActionFilms: Planned Parenthood Covers Up Statutory Rape



Video and blurb from YouTube channel LiveActionFilms.

Uploaded on Nov 9, 2007
Planned Parenthood of LA tells abortion-seeking 15 year old girl impregnated by 23 year old rapist "boyfriend" to "figure out a birthdate that works, and I don't know anything."