Showing posts with label LGBTQ component. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBTQ component. Show all posts

Friday, October 28, 2016

"HIDDEN CAM: Media Matters Brags About Sabotaging Roger Stone"



Published on Oct 28, 2016
Project Veritas Action has released the sixth video in a multi-part series that is sending shockwaves through the DNC and the Clinton campaign. In a new video released by Project Veritas Action, a PVA journalist exposes how his pay for play with Robert Creamer landed him a meeting with Bradley Beychock, the President of Media Matters For America, an organization that has been attacking James O’Keefe for years.

During the meeting, Beychock gave the PVA journalist a tour of their offices. He also proudly boasted about the Media Matters assault on conservative writer and political consultant Roger Stone.

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Friday, September 23, 2016

UNDERCOVER: FSU and UVA Embrace Fictitious 99.99% Society



Published on Sep 23, 2016
In part II of a video series released by Project Veritas, James O’Keefe once again takes on the overly sensitive college policies and professors who are mollycoddling students on campuses across the country. The video uses undercover footage to highlight the thought processes of several university faculty members and administrators at Florida State University (FSU) and University of Virginia (UVA) who take political correctness to such an extreme that they agree to the most outlandish of scenarios presented by the investigative journalists. This video features O’Keefe, VICE co-founder Gavin McInnes, Fox News contributor Guy Benson and Lucian “Twinks for Trump” Wintrich.

Watch part I here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uooL-...

Website: http://projectveritas.com/
Donate: http://projectveritas.com/donate
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritas
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas
NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel veritasvisuals.

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

NC Officials Enable Male Reporter Posing as Sexual Predator to Use Female Bathrooms



Published on Apr 27, 2016
UNC Title IX Mandatory Reporter Seems to Turn Blind Eye to Report of Sexual Deviancy in Girl’s Bathroom

Female Undercover Journalist Illustrates the Same Can Happen when Gender Roles Are Reversed

North Carolina Bathroom Gender Laws Are Not Being Enforced

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Going by the voice and resemblance, I think the female operative is probably Laura Loomer, but I'm not 100% sure.

Laura Loomer

 

Monday, December 29, 2014

2014 Project Veritas Action Year in Review



Published on Dec 29, 2014
2014 was the first year for our 501C4 organization. As we became engaged in electoral politics, you can see what a difference we made in Kentucky, Colorado, Arkansas, Texas and especially North Carolina. Please visit us online at http://projectveritasaction.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/PVeritas_Action Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit...
NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Mark Udall Advocates Condone Voter Fraud: "That’s not even like lying or stealing"



Published on Oct 22, 2014
"Awesome" is a very common word used by Democratic operatives in Colorado when discussing potential voter fraud. Project Veritas Action went undercover in the Centennial State to reveal just how prone their mail-in ballot system is to likely voter fraud.

This video exposes workers from these three organizations condoning voter fraud:

Work For Progress
Greenpeace
Rep. Joe Salazar campaign


Follow Project Veritas Action at:
http://ProjectVeritasAction.com
https://twitter.com/PVeritas_Action
https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit...

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Cynthia Jeub

Cynthia Jeub


Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Mark Pryor Insider Says He’s Lying About His Marriage Equality Stance



Published on Oct 15, 2014
Arkansas U.S. Senate candidate Mark Pryor says he supports traditional marriage, but Project Veritas Action has received tips stating that this isn't the case. We sent undercover investigators to Arkansas to see if Sen. Pryor is telling the truth or intentionally deceiving voters. Christian Hartsock contributed to this report.

Follow Project Veritas Action at:
http://ProjectVeritasAction.com
https://twitter.com/PVeritas_Action
https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVerit...

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel Project Veritas Action.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Christian Hartsock

Christian Hartsock


Tuesday, February 04, 2014

Cynthia Jeub: How I Came to Support Same-Sex Marriage, Part 2: Losing Faith in Politics

NJO: Source: Cynthia Jeub's blog.

It was March 2012 when everything I had been taught to believe about gay people began to break down. People were choosing sides in the upcoming election, and as I became more politically influential than ever before, I was becoming equally disenfranchised with politics.

The more I worked on both sides of political lines, however, I realized all people are just people, and the system is more broken than I ever knew. Simple conversations with a fellow investigative journalist, a Ron Paul supporter, and a childhood friend made me start questioning the political reasoning behind opposition to same-sex marriage rights.

A fellow videographer (NJO: Almost certainly either John Howting or Spencer Meads) drove me to the university (NJO: The University of North Carolina) we were investigating for corruption. (NJO: Some context: This was during the lead-up to the vote on North Carolina's legislatively-referred constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, known as Amendment 1, which would pass as expected, and would in October 2014 be declared unconstitutional. The "investigation" for "corruption" that James O'Keefe had sent Howting, Meads and Jeub on involved Howting and Jeub secretly filming university administrators while pretending to be students who wanted to commit voting fraud as a means to defeat the amendment and trying to get said administrators to voice some kind of endorsement or sympathetic statement on tape. Classic James.) We discussed the stronger arguments for equal marriage rights: gay couples weren’t hurting anyone with their personal lifestyle choices, so it didn’t make sense to outlaw it on grounds of harming people. Our investigation was focused around voting legality and ethics, not equal marriage, but I had to think about my priorities: I knew I believed in fighting injustice, and it didn’t seem fair that these people couldn’t live how they wished.

My friend Dave picked me up from the airport when I landed back in Colorado. A dedicated Ron Paul supporter, Dave talked to me about the primaries and didn’t ask me any questions about my secretive trip. I was leaning toward anarchy as a political philosophy (I don’t support violent revolution, but I think the ideal form of government is no government, and the means to get there is empowering individuals to govern themselves), but I didn’t support Ron Paul. Dave, too, brought up equal marriage rights. He said the government shouldn’t be making marriage official and taxing based on it anyway, so it didn’t matter if people were living outside of the so-called “definition” of marriage.

...

NJO: Whole post at Cynthia Jeub's blog.

You can see the long cut of the "investigation" here and the short and flashy cut here.

The long cut is over 3 hours long, with 13 distinct segments over (I think) 12 cuts. I say "long cut" instead of "full video" or "uncut version" because as we'll see in the following breakdown of both cuts, there were at least two surreptitious recordings made by the Project Veritas videographers as components of this "investigation" which, while included in partial form in the short and flashy cut, were for some reason excluded from the long cut.

Breakdown (work in progress):

Approximately the first 2 and a half hours consists of a series of hidden camera operations against
(a) University of North Carolina administrators (00:00 - 49:32, 49:32 - 1:21:33, 1:59:10 - 2:15:58, 2:15:58 - 2:32:30),
(b) North Carolina poll workers (1:36:13 - 1:59:10), and
(c) A phone bank operated by the anti-Amendment One campaign group Coalition to Protect All North Carolina Families (1:21:33 - 1:36:13). These operations are all carried out by John Howting, accompanied in the second segment of part (a) (49:32 - 1:21:33; a meeting with two university administrators) by Cynthia Jeub, and in part (c) (1:21:33 - 1:36:13; the phone bank) by Spencer Meads.

The next 35 minutes consists of:
(d) John Howting's phone call to citizen Zbigniew Gorzkowski (2:32:30 - 2:35:18),
(e) Two hidden camera operations carried out by a young woman (maybe Cynthia Jeub again but I'm not sure) against University of North Carolina administrators (2:35:18 - 2:50:27),
(f) Spencer Meads' non-hidden camera confrontation with citizen William Romero outside what is apparently Romero's home, in which a kid is caused to cry (2:50:27 - 2:52:46),
(g) A non-hidden camera interview with Gary Sims, then Deputy Director of Wake County Board of Elections, conducted by a young guy who doesn't sound like either Howting or Meads (2:52:46 - 3:04:32), and lastly
(h) A non-hidden camera interview with a Durham County election judge, conducted by two guys who sound like Meads and Howting but I'm not completely sure. (3:04:32 - 3:08:10)

The short cut is 10 minutes long and features:

(i) A cut-down version of Meads' confrontation with Mr Romero, this time with subtitles, the faces pixelated, and narration from James O'Keefe. (00:00-00:49)
(ii) A cut-down and subtitled version of the second of the hidden-camera-at-a-polling-place stings carried out by Howting as seen in the long cut (the one starting at about 1:53:00, where he uses the name William DeJesus Romero and puts on an accent), preceded by some brief footage of Howting walking around outside not seen in the long cut, accompanied by some narration from James indicating that the dungaree get-up he's wearing is meant to denote "a strange man". (00:49-02:00)
(iii) A segment focussing on Mr Gorzkowski, starting with narration from James, a snippet of the interview with Gary Sims from the long cut, then some footage not in the long cut of Meads walking outside wearing similar get-up as Howting's with James again indicating that this denotes a "strange man". This is then followed by footage of a hidden-camera-at-a-polling-place sting carried out by Meads that's not seen in the long cut, in which he uses the name Zbigniew Gorzkowski. (02:00 - 03:16) After that is a cut-down version of Howting's phone conversation with Mr Gorzkowski with an introductory narration by James. (03:16 - 04:41)
(iv) "Ballots offered in the name of the Dead". A cut-down and subtitled version of the first of Howting's polling place stings seen in the long cut (the one starting at 1:36:13, where he uses the name Michael G. Bolton), preceded by an introductory narration from James. (04:41 - 05:20)
(v) A brief segue into the second half of the video which focuses on the other people recorded in the long cut, i.e. the university staff, the election officials, the phone bank activists. Brief snippet (not in long cut) of John Howting outside what is presumably a University of North Carolina building, dressed as he is the second segment of the long cut (UNC ballcap, blue shirt, blonde hair) as James narrates, "We found much more than we expected". Brief snippet of the first segment of the long cut (Howting's hidden camera recording of university administrator/professor Terri Phoenix), and the election judge. (05:20 - 05:46)
(vi) Sims (05:46 - 05:56)
(vii) the county election judge (05:56 - 07:33)
(viii) Howting and Jeub (07:25 - 09:51)
(ix) An audio recording not heard in the long cut, accompanied by a still frame not seen in the long cut, of the Coalition to Protect All North Carolina Families phone bank activists (09:51 - 10:18)

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Raw Footage: Lisa Wortham & Austin North by Northwest Democrats Monthly Meeting


This video has been removed because its content violated YouTube's Terms of Service.


Published on Jan 23, 2014
No description available.

NJO: Title, video and caption from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

"Wendy Johnson"


"Wendy Johnson"


Friday, June 21, 2013

"This is sick."


Tuesday, May 15, 2012

North Carolina Raw Video - UNC Officials



Published on May 15, 2012
Raw, uncut Video of UNC officials discussing and embracing Voter Fraud

NJO: Title, video and caption from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

  • John M. Howting (He calls himself "Jason" in at least the first two segments, with the surname "Ranier" in the first segment. He uses the name "Michael G. Bolton" in the first poll worker sting, using the wording "The name is Michael G. Bolton" which thus leads the poll workers to believe that's his name without him having explicitly called himself by the name. One of the poll workers then asks him to clarify if he is "Michael Bolton Jr." and he responds "Michael G. Bolton, 1500 Dalworth. That would be correct, mm-hm." This bit deserves a proper transcript, because it's hard to be sure what these two people are understanding each other to be saying, and the fact that one of them is a grifter pulling a grift doesn't actually make it easier (To do). He then uses the name "William DeJesus Romero" in the second and third poll worker stings, using the wording "The name (is) William DeJesus Romero" which again leads the poll workers to believe that's his name without him having explicitly called himself by the name. He is identified as "Jon Buckley" in James O'Keefe's book "Breakthrough: Our Guerrilla War to Expose Fraud and Save Democracy".)
  • Cynthia Jeub (Calls herself "Rebecca" in at least the second segment.)
  • Spencer Meads (Identified as "Adam Coolidge" in James O'Keefe's book "Breakthrough: Our Guerrilla War to Expose Fraud and Save Democracy". In a snippet of video not in this long cut but included in the 10 minute slick cut, he uses the name "Zbigniew Gorzkowski" in a poll worker sting thus leading the poll workers to believe that's his name. Due to the way this piece is edited, it is not clear whether he explicitly called himself by the name or if he employed a trick of wording to avoid doing that which for some reason didn't make it into the final cut. This strikes me as suspicious.)
John Howting
Cynthia Jeub
Spencer Meads







NC Non-Citizens Voting, Dead Offered Ballots, UNC Officials Embrace Voter Fraud



Published on May 15, 2012
Since the release of our North Carolina Voter Fraud investigation on Tuesday the reaction has again been swift.

According to a report on the Daily Caller and ABC News, the administrators we interviewed at the University of North Carolina are being disciplined.

Chancellor Holden Thorp stated to ABC News, "While the scenarios described in the video were false, some of our administrators responded inappropriately, and we are taking disciplinary action against those who used poor judgment in their approach to these student imposters."

The investigation also sparked discussion of a consensus bill on Voter ID in the North Carolina legislature. Note that Governor Beverly Perdue vetoed legislation that previously passed.

Additionally, other organizations have reviewed our check of jury forms against the voter rolls and have found one individual, Mr. Romero, apparently became a naturalized citizen after refusing jury duty on the grounds of being a non-citizen.

Another individual appears to have perjured himself on the jury refusal form despite also being a naturalized citizen.

Project Veritas' journalists were offered ballots and encouraged to vote despite raising red flags with outlandish behavior -- such as speaking Spanish while asking to retrieve a foreign passport and wearing a ridiculous costume. However, while our facts were correct in the report, the perception presented in the investigation -- which highlighted the ease in which voter fraud can be committed -- deserves correction in regards to the citizenship status of Mr. Romero and Mr. Gorzkowski.

More footage coming soon . . .

North Carolina Ballots are offered out in the names of others to total strangers.
We find people who, according to Jury refusal forms, are listed as non-citizens. These individuals are also registered to vote. In one case the citizen appears to have perjured himself on the Jury-refusal form, since his jury refusal came after his voter registration. All public data is available here: http://www.projectveritas.com/ncsuppo...

Ballots are also handed out in the names of others to total strangers.
A dead voter is listed on the voter rolls. We interview an election Judge who says he only wants to uphold parts of the state constitution. We also interview the following officials at UNC who seemingly embrace voter fraud:
Terri Phoenix -- Director - UNC LGBTQ Center
Dean Blackburn UNC Assistant Dean of Students
Adam Limehouse - Director for the Coalition to Protect All NC Families.

Please Make a donation to ProjectVeritas.com

NJO: Video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

It looks as if the first eight paragraphs of the blurb were added a few days after the last three.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

John M. Howting
Cynthia Jeub
Spencer Meads


John Howting
Cynthia Jeub
Spencer Meads







Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Caught on Tape: Dead People and Clones Offered Ballots in Vermont Primary



Published on Mar 13, 2012
On Super Tuesday in Vermont, Poll workers caught on tape handing out Ballots in names of dead people and giving out ballots in living people's names to anyone who walked in. Bars, hotels and city clerk issuing civil union all required ID.

They handed the ballots out to people under the following names:

Adam Berger
Cooper Fellows
Roger Audette DEAD
John E. Adams
Lucas Hertweck
Mahamud Somo DEAD
Travis Houle
Evan R Bean

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

John M. Howting
Spencer Meads

John Howting
Spencer Meads

Monday, August 09, 2010

Operation Maple Trinity planning document


Operation Maple Trinity

Abstract:
This is an operation intended to expose the Marxist, Anti-American nature of Trinity United in Chicago in a way that can ultimately capture it in a few short minutes of condensed video to leave no doubt.  It is equally intended to capture it in such an explosive way that the Lamestream Media is forced to cover it.

Main Targets:
Otis Moss
Jeremiah Wright (if accessible)
Other TUCC pastors

Main Characters:
Martin Smith (Ken Larrey) - A white, 27 year old graduate student set to enroll at UChicago Business School, grew up in Toronto, graduated from Duke, went to work for Morgan Stanley.  Father is a retired bank executive (Toronto-Dominion bank), who also managed hedge funds, now private investor.  Family was formerly tied with and still loosely tied with the Community Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist), though they exert influence in the Liberal Party, even some in the Conservative Party.

Elijah Bernard (Shaughn Adeleye) - A black 36 year old consultant working for Bain & Company in Chicago (recently transferred from Dallas), graduated LSU, law degree Duke.  Married with one daughter, but gay (irrelevant to operation Maple Trinity). Also grew up in a Marxist family.

(optional)
1 or 2 pastors (Doug Giles perhaps, other black guy) - struggling liberation theologians around Toronto partially financed by Martin Smith's father.

Costumes/Props:
Ken:
suit, nice shoes, etc.
Flashy gold watch
Gold magnetic earring (Bill Ayers style)
Hidden camera

Shaughn:
Suit, nice shoes, etc.
Flashy Gold Watch
Hidden Camera

Other Requirements:
Lodging, parking, internet, perhaps a week or more
Travel (probably by car)
Possibly Fake Id's, Business Cards
Possibly cell phones with Chicago and/or Toronto area codes

Plot Summary:
              Elijah Bernard sets up a meeting with Otis Moss to discuss joining the church.  The brings along his friend, Martin Smith, with whom he crossed paths at Duke.  Elijah explains that he and Martin, like Moss, are both fellow travelers.  He has been telling Martin about the church and liberation theology and Martin took an interest so Elijah brought him along.
              Martin further explains who he is, that his family and their associates are committed to a Marxist transformation of Canada, we have seen the evils and oppression of capitalism, we seek to end the evils of globalization, and we are committed to putting a stop to the evil foreign wars and invasions of the Canadian/American empires.  Martin explains that he is considering attending a few sermons and establishing a relationship with the Church, jokes about how odd it will be being white.  Martin hands Moss a copy of To Set the Captives Free: Liberation Theology in Canada as a gift and explains that though he grew up being taught that religion is wrong, that it was a tool to pacify the masses to accept their lot, his father and other Marxists in Canada had come to understand the value of liberation theology.  Although Martin is not as directly involved in the movement, he is there representing his father and his father's interests.  They are interested in sending some of their own pastors who have been trying to learn and advance liberation theology in Canada to learn at Trinity United.

[The conversation will likely evolve from there.  Moss is likely to inquire about this proposal and the whole situation.  We aim to lead Otis Moss into a discussion about Marxism, Liberation Theology, Liberation Theology in Canada, the subversion of the church for Marxist purposes, etc.  The point is to make our intentions clear and explain them as what would seem to most people as a nefarious/cynical plot.  Here are some talking points to throw in.}

            Martin explains that the state of Canada is such that the conservatives are in power and the socialization of Canada has been stalled and is even in decline.  We believe a big part of the reason Marxism is failing in Canada is because we have failed to control the churches.  Liberation Theology gives us a way to use the gospel and the church to advance Marxism and Marxist principles.
            Martin also explains that even though Trinity United teaches Black Liberation Theology, his family's interest is in liberation theology, as the black population of Canada is 2.5%.  However, the black church is also uniquely of interest because in addition to organization black churches, we have this (particularly bold, edgy, creative) idea of taking note of the energy, emotion, and soul that has always been a part of the black church, and which we believe is so important to bringing diverse groups together and lifting their spirits, and adapting it to other churches even for wishes.  We believe nobody does this better than Trinity United.  Most importantly, we want to study how Trinity United manages all the little things that go into managing a church and bringing people into the Marxist movement.  Community outreach, recruiting, establishing ties with local government, etc.  It's one thing to read about using liberation theology to foment Marxist revolutionary spirits, it's another to do it in real life.
             Discuss other various Alinksy principles.  Discuss the Clarence-Piven strategy and its (supposed) implementation in Canada as a path to Marxist transformation.  Discuss how my family has always understood the importance of controlling the banks.  Perhaps also discuss the importance of keeping them out of the hands of the Jews leading into another conversation about the "damn Jews."
             Mention that Martin's father also has "other sources" of funding as another reason it would be of interest to establish a relationship with the church.

[end of first meeting]


Some of this stuff could/should be thrown in by Elijah, I suppose, as we don't want him just sitting there.  Also, towards the end of this first meeting is where I could throw in the separate operation involving the gay aspect where Martin leaves the room and Elijah takes it from there.  I don't think the gay aspect is totally useless.  If we get Moss to condone and/or facilitate a married man cheating on his wife with gay guys (or Jeremiah Wright doing so), that would make national headlines in and of itself as he would likely be forced to resign as pastor.  On the other hand, even if it worked and we decided that would be counterproductive, we could bury it.
            Additional meetings could then be set up, if necessary, and arrangements could be made to bring in one or two of our pastors to introduce to Otis Moss.  Other meetings can be made with other pastors.  We could try to get a meeting with Jeremiah Wright.  Also at this point we would have the option of throwing in some explicitly illegal aspects to this whole affair.  I do think that simply the discussion alone, if it goes right, should be enough to make a big story.  However, if we can work a bribe or two into this, or some sort of child sex ring, we'll work on that.  We could also explore some of these other scenarios with different pastors if we feel we have everything we need on the Marxist issue from Otis Moss.

NJO: Accompanying email here. 

Source: Occupy For Accountabiliity and www.velvetrevolution.us. The date is an estimate.

Monday, March 01, 2010

James sadly can't make it to hate group's banquet, does admire their work tho

NJO: Originally posted at MassResistance.org. It's an anti-LGBT rights hate group.

You are cordially invited to the MassResistance banquet!

Saturday evening, March 6, 2010
Holiday Inn, 242 Adams Place, Boxborough, MA  (Rts. 495 & 111)

$40.00 per person / $375 for a table of 10
Registration and cash bar from 6:15 p.m.  Dinner at 7:00 p.m.

RSVP immediately: Contact us at: 781-890-6001 or Amy@MassResistance.org
THIS WILL BE AN INCREDIBLE EVENING!
Here's the lineup:

Peter LaBarbera: The national GLBT movement in 2010

And countering the GLBT Agenda under Barack Obama.

Peter LaBarbera is president of Americans For Truth about Homosexuality, (AFTAH), the pre-eminent group dedicated to exposing the homosexual activist agenda and opposing their radical efforts to change America. He is perhaps the most authoritative voice in the country on the history, goals, and tactics of that movement.

He has written extensively on most aspects of the homosexual, bisexual, and "transgender" agenda -- with special focus on the inroads that the pro-homosexuality movement has made among America's youth -- and has done over a thousand interviews on the subject. He has worked with Concerned Women for America and Family Research Council, and headed the Illinois Family Institute.

LaBarbera has debated the top homosexual advocates while appearing on hundreds of TV and radio news programs, including FOX's Hannity and Colmes, CNN's "The Larry King Show" and CNN's "Crossfire," C-SPAN's "Washington Journal," National Public Radio's "All Things Considered," and Bill O'Reilly's and Alan Colmes' nationally syndicated radio programs. He has been quoted on homosexuality-related issues in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, Chicago Sun-Times, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, as well as by Associated Press and Reuters.


Newly released James O'Keefe video exposing 2009 Mass. transgender conference -- beyond description! First viewing ever.

In January 2009 before he became famous, James O'Keefe went undercover for MassResistance at a regional transgender conference in Peabody, MA. This footage will be seen for the first time at this banquet. What he saw there is beyond description. But it is society's future if the transgender movement - and the current "Transgender rights and hate crimes bill" - continues to move forward.


Brian Camenker:
Saul Alinsky's tactics and how they affect you

Brian Camenker will give a brief tutorial on the radical strategies of Saul Alinsky and how they are affecting you now. Alinsky, who wrote Rules for Radicals, is considered a founding father of the radical left in America that is dedicated to changing society. Barack Obama spent years teaching Alinsky's methods as an ACORN organizer in Chicago. Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on Alinsky. You NEED to know what Alinsky is all about, and how his ideology for changing America is affecting your life.


Scott Lively:
The focus on Uganda by pro-homosexual activists

Dr. Lively is founder of Abiding Truth Ministries, the Pro-Family Law Center, DefendTheFamily.com, and most recently the Redemption Gate Ministry Society in Springfield, Mass. He has been under relentless attack by homosexual groups for his writings and activism, most recently regarding his involvement in Uganda where he advised the government on legislation regarding homosexuality.

He will have copies of his outstanding new book, Redeeming the Rainbow, A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda for sale at the banquet. The book was released online on the MassResisance website several months ago - but at the banquet you'll be able to get it in book form (so you don't have to print out hundreds of pages).

Many of you will remember Dr. Lively's incredible speech at last year's banquet.


This will be an incredible evening! (And you'll get a great dinner.)

NOTE: On Monday, James O'Keefe, the main speaker for our banquet this Saturday night and the celebrated videographer who exposed ACORN, informed us by telephone that he would not be coming. Citing his upcoming court case stemming from a recent undercover operation in New Orleans, he told us that, while he admires our work, "my priority is to raise money for my attorney."

We would certainly have preferred that O'Keefe had informed us of that earlier. But over the last 24 hours we have been able to come up with an outstanding -- maybe even better -- lineup for this weekend's banquet!
Since our originally announced speaker will not be there, we are willing to refund anyone the money who has already paid. (Please let us know right away if you change your plans.) But we really think this lineup will more than make up for it!  Hope to see you all on Saturday night!


NJO: James' video can be be seen here.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

From the files of Ben Wetmore: "The Structure of Video Activism"


NJO: "Benjamin Wetmore: A mentor of mine; a genius", said James O'Keefe in an interview in September 2009. So let's take a look at some of the wisdom of this certifiably mentorial influence on James' life.

Today, from January 2010, "The Structure of Video Activism".

Speech: The Structure of Video Activism
Ben Wetmore


1. figure out your values, and figure out what you want changed in the world
-easier said than done
-write out your values, write out your demands, it becomes a good action-list
-always a danger of mission creep
-many people get scared when things get dicey: anything controversial yields to the common man's temerity and anxiety. It's when people are afraid that it's most compelling, when you force them to take a side, when you make them physically uncomfortable, you force them to reset those careful mental equations they've constructed to live in a society with so many contradictions. Always force the common man to wipe the chalkboard clean and start anew.
-this keeps you focused.
-the dan Flynn rule that all channels about entertainment eventually become the E! television network. The desire for ratings, attention and popularity will always, inevitably, over time turn you into playboy/hustler magazine unless you have a solid foundation as to what your identity is, and so write out your principles and stick to them.
Practical example: neocons we were working with only wanted to do stuff about terrorism, they wanted to do all sorts of fabulous ridiculous and crazy things that I liked, but only on their topic, and they then became hostile to anything that wasn't advancing that agenda. The lack of an agenda will always eventually yield to a minority's serious agenda in time.
Practical application: write a mission statement and don't be afraid to be specific, then write out your demands. CM articles

2. pick a good and worthwhile target
-dont waste your time on bureaucrats/teachers/low-level people, strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter. Find the lever, find the man behind the curtain.
-pick one that's well known, someone worth dethroning. Don't waste your time with low-level pukes who are just pawns of the king.
-pick the target, personalize it, polarize it and perpetually hit harder.
-explain to people the way in which the target hurts them, the way in which they hurt real people. This takes creativity but fundamentally isn't difficult.
-don't be afraid to attack people the media tells you is on our side, some of the best satire is focused on people who never get attacked: i.e. the banks.
Practical example: SGA vs. Ladner;
Practical application: name the target and set the goal; you want Mayor Smith fired.
3. learn about the target, find out as much information as possible
-need an information network of sorts, need to be among the people
-you can't just start making accusations or just going off half-cocked
-good research skills usually involves a lot of reading and a lot of listening
-reconstruct a resume, look up lawsuits, make public records requests
-publish everything you find on a basic blog at blogger, don't hide your dirt, the left does this with all their targeted congressional targets; the wash post called me for dirt on ladner, and I told them I published it all, I didn't have much to add; most journalists never publish the good stuff they find, they leverage it for more access or use it to boost their prestige; most reporters are entirely awful human beings.
Practical example: james accidentally going to a pregnancy center asking for a racist donation for an abortion.
Practical application: make a menu of all the questions you want to have answered, and make a separate list of all the known places of potential information on your target.
4. identify and exploit their weakness
-with public figures, its the most common complaint everyone knows
-provide documentation to confirm the conventional wisdom: is he an alcoholic? is he a womanizer? is he a gambler? feed into their preconceived expectations.
-hypocrisy always sells; use their values against them; internalize the values and language of your ideological opponents, it breeds an amazing amount of confusion.
-read psychology/advertising/marketing and counterinsurgency books: influence by cialdini is the best.
-gossip is often half-true
Practical example: PP racism; dog abortion; LTPC ("you're the most progressive people here")
Practical application: understand your opponents and anticipate their reactions
5. structure the jokes and criticism
-make sure to get feedback, make sure your stuff is actually funny; major risk: inside jokes that aren't funny to anyone.
-most jokes are relatively simple and direct
-pop culture references are easy and people latch onto them like white on rice
-always use a prop: the prop focuses their attention: make the prop funny in itself (we spent hours talking just about props); always use a costume, but make it relevant, chicken costume/bailout story.
Past props:
bailout - big checks
ltpc - gays
Chicken costume - all stunts
Gay marriage - assless chaps
ACORN - pimp costume
-new type of humor: awkward moments, a la the office; LTPC: Anton's comment "well maybe you can learn"
Practical example: the gay marriage video doesn't have enough jokes
Practical application: write out the jokes about your subject that are actually funny to normal people, and make sure those jokes are easily understandable, don't hide the ball and don't depend on inside information.
6. find the natural allies and assess what they can do for you
-most of the time it's just word of mouth/marketing
-but it can also be additional people and volunteers
-they can also waste your time, so avoid the bitches: everyone has an opinion and none of them are useful.
Practical example: SFLA is sitting on dog abortion; SFLA staffers also needlessly delayed the PP-racism project on almost endless theological debates/disputes, some groups and some people will never be converted, just as you can't stop to kick every barking dog, you can't stop to engage and win over every dissenting group whose support is conditioned on them agreeing entirely with you, most of the time their assistance is only word of mouth anyway.
Practical application: write out the people who can help you, and what they can realistically provide. Don't ask them for more than that, and don't involve them more than that. It's a time-suck.
7. figure out your endgame
-a firing isn't enough, you want permanent systemic change; you don't want same shit different day.
-best example: Rome's solution to Carthage; Carthage delondo est.
-howard dean didn't run to win, he ran to build a movement, and he did a fabulous job. People laughed at Soros 'wasting' 500 mil. in 2004, but he used it to build a movement and institutions that changed the world. His goal was not the Presidency as much as it was the entire nation, that's an endgame.
-most people fail to dream big enough here, have big demands so that the compromises are still amazing
Practical example: Ladner's gone and his replacements are still there, there was never a period of denazification; ACORN will likely get refunded or just change names; don't get depressed about this but keep perspective and find a way to set your goals in such a way that makes their recovery impossible.
Practical application: have a few written major goals, the things that would change the world if things were different. Have major unrealistic goals, because realizing them is much more realistic than you think.
8. strike where they're weakest, don't let up at all
-remain formless and be immune from criticism, don't lie cheat or steal because they'll find out and it'll make you a magnet for criticism; look at the insane ways they criticize james, imagine if he had done something stupid-- it would have been fatal to the project.
-dont fall for the trap that it's honorable to leave them alone when they're down, when they're down, kick twice as hard
-use as many creative ways possible to 'expand the conflict' so that they're fighting on all fronts; most people have zero ability to counter humor and art, for example
-don't fight 'fair', fair is for losers, winners win.
-keep a hard heart, and remember that they kill babies for sport, don't feel bad for them.
-it's like half-treating a virus, it'll adapt and grow stronger and attack again; or a killer in a thriller movie, Jason is never really dead.
-always be the punisher, never forget and never forgive short of full conversions: Michael schiavo will always be a free man for having killed Terri, but who is lodging weekly disbarment motions against Judge Greer? Answer: no one.
Practical example: the GOP has almost given up on ACORN. People are weak and often give up. I found reasons to hate Ladner on such a strong visceral level that I never gave him the benefit of the doubt. AU/rape cover-up; Ladner/scholarship revocation, find someone to blame for your angst, and remember Eric Hoffer's observation about people's motivations about mass movements.
Practical application: when you have something hot, never let up. Create a fanatical desire within yourself to prevail. Identify your own catalytic passions and hold onto them, never let go. Be angry, but stay smart.
9. plan for the long-haul, keep expanding the conflict to other people until they give in
-even if you step away from the fight for a week or year, come back to it and keep the pressure on
-these people are weaker than you think, but they also have better lasting power even though that seems contradictory -- over time you will win, but it will seem like forever.
-over time people will believe whatever sincere critique you offer
-someone will ALWAYS say this STUPID line, "but, if you attack them, you only make them stronger." which is code for "I'm scared, so let's not do anything and lose, because I'm weak." - this is almost always a mistake. if you have nothing to do, attack. if you have something lame to do, attack. attack their weak points every chance you get. not only does this make you aggressive, but it tests you and refines your work. As well, you never know what great things will come from action. Action, action action!
Practical example: it took five years for Ladner to get removed; no one expected ACORN to get defunded - the support for the Iraq war, in summer of 2006 there was still a great deal of public support, but the public critique wore them down and evaporated support.
Practical application: Always take action. Call me when you get depressed or discouraged, we'll go for a drink and I'll cheer you up. The cost of this is that I expect the same arrangement.
10. market your idea and not yourself
-vanity will easily become so consuming that you lose sight of what made you interesting, keep focused on the project, on the work, on what matters
-vanity is very appealing
-use attractive women
-don't get caught up with controlling the media message, provide the content and keep it going
-when you become the issue, you're no longer effective. Remain formless.
-glory comes at the cost of effectiveness, or as Reagan said or was quoted as saying, "there's no limit to what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit."
Practical example: Lila/racism PP investigation; laura bush undercover op.
Practical application: Keep people around you who support you but who will give you serious feedback, and critical feedback, and actively solicit negative opinions and don't dismiss them. Imbue yourself with a culture of self-improvement.

Friday, June 26, 2009

Brokeback Priests: Priests tell Gays to Stay Gay


Ben and James go undercover in Boston and get homosexual advice from two Reformed "Catholic" Franciscan Ministers.




NJO: A video titled "Brokeback Priests: Priests tell Gays to Stay Gay" was uploaded to James O'Keefe's YouTube channel VeritasVisuals in the summer of 2009 but was later made "private". As with the Love Thy Prisoner Campaign video, its content was recorded at Boston Gay Pride 2009. The above caption is from the archived YouTube page. The 3 still frames are taken from YouTube via a bit of URL trickery.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Ben R. Wetmore
Anthony Pombal

Monday, June 22, 2009

Love Thy Prisoner Campaign: Adopt a Jihad Detainee



Uploaded on Jun 22, 2009
Progressives in Boston sign petitions to be pen pals with Guantanamo Bay detainees and put them into their loving homes.

NJO: Title, video and blurb from James O'Keefe's YouTube account VeritasVisuals. It takes place at Boston Pride 2009. The guy with the screwy-up face is Ben Wetmore, the tall guy with the grey cap is of course James O'Keefe, and I believe the guy with the sailor hat and sunglasses is named Anthony Pombal.

Minions / fellow culture warriors involved:

Ben Wetmore
Anthony Pombal

Ben Wetmore posted the video to his blog (mirrored here) on the same day it was uploaded. The comments from the blog post provide insight into the thinking behind the project, so here they are:

Comments:
Anonymous Convservative Christian said...
Just because someone was picked up and put in Guantanamo, does not mean they are terrorists. As Christ instructs, we are to love even our enemy. As Americans, we ought to especially care for the wrongfully imprisoned, those who have never been given a trial, those who have never been charged, those against whom no evidence has been brought. What do you propose? That we keep them locked up forever and never tried?
September 16, 2009 at 7:35 AM
Blogger . said...
Conservative Christian, I think this is where Christianity descends into insanity. I agree to love thy neighbor, and even love thy enemy, but the largest misnomer possible is that you have to 'turn your cheek' to every act of aggression. If that were true, then let a molester violate a child, let a murderer kill your family. Christians can kill with a clear conscience when the cause is just. You can care about someone and understand that there's no room in this world for them. The Christian crusades are the best example of this, and the world would be a better place if Mohammadism had been wiped off the map. The answer short of that is certainly not to let them into your home, and write loving letters to them. The answer is to have a damn spine, a backbone, kill the enemy, hope for the best, and convert those who are able to be converted. Walking into your murderer's sword on some misguided interpretation of Christian pacifism is not noble, it's suicidal. Charles Martel was a great Christian conquerer.
September 29, 2009 at 4:49 PM
Anonymous Conervative Christian said...
By your response, you still seem to assume that just by being in Guantanamo, you are guilty, even without a trial. Some of these prisoners were just kids when picked up, some of them are Chinese dissidents picked up in the border region between Afghanistan and China, Although China considers them terrorists, that does not mean we, as Americans ought to. Also by your response you seem to assume that everyone killed in the Crusades deserved to die, even the Orthodox Christians mercilessly slaughtered by the Crusaders? Perhaps you should be a bit more thoughtful about who you wipe off the map and not assume that just because your sword has found its way into their gut, they must be guilty. At least you ought to do a little research into who all is being held at Guantanamo before you decide there is no room in the world for them.
October 25, 2009 at 7:46 PM
Anonymous Ben said...
alright, well let's turn it around, are all the people in Guantanamo innocent? Would you house one who is guilty and released on a technicality? "Christianity" too often gets defined solely by weakness, by this mindlessness which says "help everyone always" and forgets that there are some people who have to be fought, otherwise you turn into a pacifist, a lamb for the slaughter. I don't think that everyone the government locks up is guilty, but I think that those who blindly advocate for shutting down Guantanamo are motivated by self-righteousness and false notions of Christianity rather than reason, forgetting to be as wise as snakes. In fact, I can't condemn you enough without resorting to name-calling. I think your point and your perspective is ridiculous and wrong and self-destructive. You are the intellectual self-immolation of society. And what of Charles Martel? What of the greatest of Christians who saved millions and future billions of souls by having the strength to act in lieu of your philosophical malaise? If only the Viennese had opened their gates to the barbarians and preached love and Christian happiness, surely Suleiman would have laughed and put aside their differences and all would be forgiven.
November 4, 2009 at 1:10 AM